SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Applix is back in action
An SI Board Since February 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3014 28 0 APLX
Emcee:  Magnifique Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
839 I already have. In the past also - on an unrelated subject. Resulted in a flicarl griffith-2/22/1997
838 Dear Mag: thanks for the tips, and for the hearty laugh I got with your last pRobert K. Schott-2/21/1997
837 Dear Robert, most of the time you drive me nuts......... because i paid generouMagnifique-2/21/1997
836 Carl, why ........ don.t you send your message to Bill Gates ,instead ofMagnifique-2/21/1997
835 Magnifique: canning the sarcasm, I just want to say to you that if one believeRobert K. Schott-2/21/1997
834 Carl: thanks for your comments. my feeling right now is that APLX is so increRobert K. Schott-2/21/1997
833 Robert, hi. MSFT and APLX would be good partners; not as 'pure' as a carl griffith-2/21/1997
832 Mag: Applix is a four engine jet that flew last year on one and a half--and stRobert K. Schott-2/21/1997
831 Dear Robert, I will be glad to give you list of stocks that will take about 1Magnifique-2/20/1997
830 To all: important. after making my last post, I decided once again to try theRobert K. Schott-2/20/1997
829 Magnifique: in anticiaption of some funds I expect in next month, I would likeRobert K. Schott-2/20/1997
828 Carl: (continued) in any event, at these levels--unless someone knows of someRobert K. Schott-2/20/1997
827 Carl: I too suggested MSFT as a possible takeover candidate for APLX awhile baRobert K. Schott-2/20/1997
826 Boy, that WAS bloody. I'm sure there is someone out there who has been ridThomas C. White-2/18/1997
825 Hey, if you guys think that <b>APLX</b> is getting hit hard, check Kelly Sheppard-2/18/1997
824 Blighty is not too bad a place. The Village Pub is still a good place to get lcarl griffith-2/18/1997
823 Carl: thanks for the input. rambling? on the contrary, very insightful commeRobert K. Schott-2/18/1997
822 Phew! Where to start?! Quite easy, really as I know too little to comment in carl griffith-2/18/1997
821 Carl: if I am interpreting your post correctly, you are saying that this new RRobert K. Schott-2/17/1997
820 Magnifique, hello - thank you for the generous welcome. Maybe this is the cacarl griffith-2/17/1997
819 I am not au fait with it, but as Reuters has recently released Reuters 3000, wocarl griffith-2/17/1997
818 Bloomberg could buy these guys. as could Dow Jones Telerate. Much more likely Peter R Smith-2/16/1997
817 To all: as I recently said, Applix has now spent about two years worth of profRobert K. Schott-2/16/1997
816 JMM forget about advises,APLX has good story behind, but acting pretty poorly pMagnifique-2/15/1997
815 Robert ,I am afraid you are comparing apples to oranges.........In regards withMagnifique-2/15/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):