SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Trickle Portfolio
An SI Board Since October 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
1784 65 0
Emcee:  tuck Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
84another one to watch maybe, but private for now: graffinity.com binding assay:Luke-11/7/2000
83I couldn't tell you for sure what portion of their revenue they derive, howeDr. Voodoo-11/6/2000
82Doc Voodoo, Thanks for the idea on MTD. Do you know off the top of your head ituck-11/6/2000
81Another interesting instrumentation play is MTD. Mettler-Toledo..Makes balancesDr. Voodoo-11/6/2000
80Hamilton.... in the old days, they were known for small glass syringes that fiscaram(o)uche-11/6/2000
79Perhaps another trickle player, VGNX, which one of the watch list stocks owns a tuck-11/6/2000
78Bruker is probably the best supplier for high magnetic field instrumentation. IDr. Voodoo-11/6/2000
77Any of you folks consider NEXL a trickle play? Or is the main future driver of tuck-11/6/2000
76Wilder, Nice try. BDAL's been on the list for a while (just attached the ptuck-11/6/2000
75I do not recall seeing this one proposed as a "watch list" item. BDALkeokalani'nui-11/6/2000
74<i>Wondering what Peter sees in BIOI. </i> Bought it when it was reBiomaven-11/6/2000
73Thread, I remember Covalent. They and QTRN seemed to be the two best pure CRO tuck-11/6/2000
72Minnow that might be worth a second glance - Nov. 6 /PRNewswire/ -- Covalent Grnigel bates-11/6/2000
71Pretty standard for prototypes like this to be placed on the basis of conditionascaram(o)uche-11/5/2000
70Tuck, regarding SMDX. BulbaMan caught my attention here too. But I am going tokeokalani'nui-11/5/2000
69Your sarcasm is very appropriate, IMO. I know this business well, and this is tscaram(o)uche-11/5/2000
68tom, You had it right. See, all the technicians hired to run the trickle down tuck-11/5/2000
67This is a LOL on me, Tuck. I threw MDS into my chart service and brought up Midtom pope-11/5/2000
66BulbaMan, SMDX looks interesting. Anybody care to comment on their stuff? Nextuck-11/5/2000
65tom, I'm getting to the point at which I'm going to start nibbling at ctuck-11/5/2000
64Don't recall seeing this posted anywhere. kiplinger.com Kiplinger's Msmh-11/4/2000
63MDS? Or did I miss an essential part of the discussion?tom pope-11/4/2000
62>> Traditional to assume an opening kitty of $100,000, isn't it? <&scaram(o)uche-11/4/2000
61OK, The trickle portfolio manager will start slapping some names together. >tuck-11/4/2000
60Here's an example of a recent "trickle" IPO. They raised $80 millscaram(o)uche-11/3/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):