SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Knight/Trimark Group, Inc.
An SI Board Since July 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
10027 74 0 KCG
Emcee:  jacksoo Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
8452 kendall, that was a different article. The PWJC analyst refuted a comment madegbh-6/5/2000
8451 Bear Stearns comments in the TSC column were refuted by Paine webber today. Itkendall harmon-6/5/2000
8450 Gary - I officially give up trying to make sense of these guys. That is why I nSir Francis Drake-6/5/2000
8449 Morgan, either the TSC article is plainly wrong, or this Bloomberg article is wgbh-6/5/2000
8448 - Nite's in play now - Merrill would have a hard time buying Knight b/c blankmind-6/5/2000
8447 Amy Buttes new valuation of NITE from a research note today - $8 7/8. LOL! WhatSir Francis Drake-6/5/2000
8446 Another bashing from TSC, is Amy B. the ONLY analyst anyone talks to about NITEAlohal-6/5/2000
8445 Our sweetheart seems to have a new target for NITE. Less than $10.00 now!!!! fiberman-6/5/2000
8444 Devastating article: Courtesy of BeLkMike of RB -- ragingbull.com <<MeSir Francis Drake-6/5/2000
8443 BWAC, hadn't thought of that re: HRZG, but this is one of my biggest worriegbh-6/5/2000
8442 <i>It could well be that most all market order end up at NITE, but limit gbh-6/5/2000
8441 When thinking about HRZG+NITE, I considered the possibility that SEC issues of Sir Francis Drake-6/5/2000
8440 Has anybody given thought to a theory that maybe HRZG got itself on the wrong sBWAC-6/5/2000
8439 Gary, I use L2 and trade through AMTD, EGRP, and Brown. I do see where my limiBWAC-6/5/2000
8438 <i>ML is doing ALL the clearing for KTG. I wonder if there is any competigbh-6/5/2000
8437 BWAC, EGRP, AMTD, TWE flow almost exclusively to NITE from what I understand. gbh-6/5/2000
8436 ML is doing ALL the clearing for KTG. I wonder if there is any competitive advaSir Francis Drake-6/5/2000
8435 I don't know what is inaccurate about it. Other than we maybe are getting mBWAC-6/5/2000
8434 Morgan, yeah, obviously the writer was clueless to periphery activity. And pgbh-6/5/2000
8433 Gary, huh? <<Investors seemed to have little reaction to the reported deSir Francis Drake-6/5/2000
8432 MER/HRZG deal not quite done yet.. Merrill Lynch, Herzog Decline to gbh-6/5/2000
8431 OT<<Question: If you are so upset about my alleged "false allegationSir Francis Drake-6/5/2000
8430 I ask this question once, but maybe you can help. How can we find out who theifiberman-6/5/2000
8429 BWAC, where do you get this inaccurate info? AMTD and EGRP are NITE's two gbh-6/5/2000
8428 Gary, no question, the impact on fundamentals is not great (though slightly negSir Francis Drake-6/5/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News