NANO | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks
NANO

An SI Board Since February 1996

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
2272	39	0	NANO

Emcee: Norrin Radd	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
847	HIram I agree with your caution but I still remember 1987 and the fact that t	milton	-	8/12/1997
846	Joe D. To echo your sentiments, that is why I loaded up at 5 7/8. NANO stil	milton	-	8/12/1997
845	E.Graphs: Good call on nano nano.Ciao,G.G.	g grovesready	-	8/12/1997
844	Doug, I agree with you that Fluke(FLK) is a good candidate to take over NANO. I	Wade	-	8/12/1997
843	I talked to NANO in the Semicon West. They said there is one competitor to the	lee wang	-	8/12/1997
842	Joe, I think you have caught the main reasons to be in NANO. We are in for the	Wade	-	8/12/1997
841	JDN, Good point of using high stock price as the leverage. However, the good fu	Wade	-	8/12/1997
840	Todd, < Let's talk numbers and fundamentals not hype. What we want is f	Hiram Walker	-	8/12/1997
839	JDN, that is absolutely 100% wrong. How about 1929? How about Japan in 1989? Th	Hiram Walker	-	8/12/1997
838	Dia Oko, you are hear also? Well we own some of the same stocks,hopefully we ar	Hiram Walker	-	8/12/1997
837	Thanks Wade and Tom. To all, I thought I share my opinion on this NANO why I bo	Joeseph Dame	-	8/12/1997
836	Look at little Nanoots at $11 now.............yes!!	E. Graphs	-	8/12/1997
835	JDN. Good point.With the stock moving up nano might not need the pr people as b	g grovesready	-	8/12/1997
834	I signed up yesterday at 9 3/4. With its current quantity of cash and current	Bob Richmann	-	8/12/1997
833	Dear Todd: Your points and questions are very good. I dont know the answers t	JDN	-	8/12/1997
832	OK SI convince me: I've followed NANO now for a few months. Fundamentals	T Bowl	-	8/12/1997
831	Dear Wade: Yes, I read that too but its hard to imagin he is going to use CASH	JDN	-	8/12/1997
830	Dear Cody: In response to your post and at the risk of offending some I will a	JDN	-	8/12/1997
829	milton, As noted I my previous reply, they need to be nimble as they may becom	Douglas V. Fant	-	8/12/1997
828	Wade, If they accumulate too much cash then they become a tempting "targe	Douglas V. Fant	-	8/12/1997
827	Hiram and JDN: I have found your theorizing interesting so I wouldn't mind	Cody Goebel	-	8/11/1997
826	Hi JDN, I recalled that Mr. Coates indicated that NANO was looking at other com	Wade	-	8/11/1997
825	Dia, Thanks. NANO broke 2 year closing high, but did not break the 2 year intra	Wade	-	8/11/1997
824	Joeseph, The current ratio is the current assets divided by the current liabili	Wade	-	8/11/1997
823	Wade and all: Congradulations, NANO did it today and broke its two year barrier	dia oko	-	8/11/1997

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):