SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Covad Communications - COVD
An SI Board Since January 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
10485 112 0 COVD
Emcee:  Mark Duper Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
8510"Those who are part of this scam will be there saying it's only a phantGeoff Altman-9/4/2004
8509Geoff - I agree. The key is to keep this issue in the news. Otherwise, the scarrufff-9/4/2004
8508<i>No, I'm trying to build a case on facts. Fact: for naked shorting rrufff-9/4/2004
8507<i>How real it is and what time span are we talking about?</i> No iAndre Williamson-9/4/2004
8506Andre, I am hearing some major $ on the possible settlement(s) or court decisionrjk01-9/4/2004
8505<i>I disagree with most of your post to the extent that you try to find anAndre Williamson-9/4/2004
8504rrufff, I like this one even better because of the author. The SEC and the DTC Geoff Altman-9/4/2004
8503I disagree with most of your post to the extent that you try to find an answer wrrufff-9/4/2004
8502Its obvious that Covad will be offering the service to current customers, once aCaptain James T. Kirk-9/3/2004
8501If Covd wins in this ongoing court case (see news today) and the one they have grjk01-9/3/2004
8500When lynch sold at a high everyone was screaming that he "know". Now trjk01-9/3/2004
8499I will tell you what Jim, I will offer you the same deal I gave the Cap If Voicerjk01-9/3/2004
8498How many firms that you now about are switching to the technology? If it so hotJim Fraser-9/3/2004
8497For what its worth I think the reality is a mix of the different opinions here. rjk01-9/3/2004
8496<i>An informal poll is your basis of your opinion</i> No, the poll Andre Williamson-9/3/2004
8495Andre - I think you're exaggerating both the value of your opinion and the errufff-9/3/2004
8494I totally agree with you, "investors' repeated scapegoating of "Geoff Altman-9/3/2004
8493<i>Far better argue the authors, to weaken rivals to a poiont near death aAndre Williamson-9/3/2004
8492Back to a previous topic (i.e. covd "servival") amazon.com Killing therjk01-9/3/2004
8491<i>Not saying naked shorting is or isn't a problem here but that abuseAndre Williamson-9/3/2004
8490Not saying naked shorting is or isn't a problem here but that abuse exists iGeoff Altman-9/3/2004
8489Andre - the "naked shorting" issue engenders a lot of emotion and as irrufff-9/3/2004
8488<i>as I study the "naked short" problem</i> Food for thouAndre Williamson-9/3/2004
8487I disagree with your suggestion that VOIP is not being adopted. The key for COVrrufff-9/3/2004
8486VOIP is not being adopted Based on what? Everything I read point the other way. rjk01-9/2/2004
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News