SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
The Enron Scandal - Unmoderated
An SI Board Since January 2002
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3602 25 0 ENE
Emcee:  Jorj X Mckie Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
852Maybe they are typed clearly but so is this. MOJPOJohasiqghwpxei hqwpiehc qpuhec.horn-1/28/2002
851And you need to lay off the thesaurus, I think you mean unintelligible, illegiblThe Duke of URL©-1/28/2002
850Geezus.. You need to <i>lay</i> off the sauce. Your posts are illegc.horn-1/28/2002
849I'm thinking the GX was not a 'major contributor'... ...of either/obonnuss_in_austin-1/28/2002
848Consider the source. You should be insulted if Bonehead thought otherwise.Lazarus_Long-1/28/2002
847Sorry, 'Ish.' It was nothing personal. -g- / eombonnuss_in_austin-1/28/2002
846"And you are moderated off the forum for the SECOND time." **********Ann Corrigan-1/28/2002
845<< I don't see where Bush was mentioned in the article or anywhere elsIsh-1/28/2002
844Oops, a mistake.Ann Corrigan-1/28/2002
843Whose Bush? Edit: I don't see where Bush was mentioned in the article or aTom C-1/28/2002
842Did you see Bush's name mentioned?Ish-1/28/2002
841<<you stupid idiot, is what...>> You hurt my feelings and made me cIsh-1/28/2002
840Ish, You can be a part of the discussion or you can attack people. It's youTom C-1/28/2002
839What is great about the link, you stupid idiot, is what... ... is contained WITbonnuss_in_austin-1/28/2002
838bia, Thanks for the kind words. I was a GBLX speculator as well. Though I ovRaymond Duray-1/28/2002
837<<Great link. Thx, scott. / bia / eom >> Great link to what? Crap?Ish-1/28/2002
836Now stockman scott may be drooling and you masterbating over this article but thIsh-1/28/2002
835LOL!! What a wonderful post, 'Raymond Duray!' ... I wish I had your invbonnuss_in_austin-1/28/2002
834Great link. Thx, scott. / bia / eombonnuss_in_austin-1/28/2002
833In a New World, a Puzzling Directive From the S.E.C. By GRETCHEN MORGENSON The stockman_scott-1/28/2002
832Ahhhhhhhhh....Therein lies the story....(no pun intended...) ............<i&KLP-1/28/2002
831jlallen, Re: <i>You obviously don't understand the distinction betweRaymond Duray-1/28/2002
830Shad, Nice to hear from ya. Been awhile. Now about this here Nature article.Raymond Duray-1/28/2002
829You can see why "paycheck protection" isn't high on the list of caMulhollandDrive-1/28/2002
828and don't you think the last sentence of the article is a master of understaMulhollandDrive-1/28/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):