SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
JMAR Technologies(JMAR)
An SI Board Since March 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
9695 80 0 JMAR
Emcee:  James Bowser Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
8520 I am glad that they were honest and up front about the reason for decreases oveBilberry-11/4/1999
8519 OK, the bad news is out. Is the worst over?timwa-11/4/1999
8518 Well, it could have been worse. At least sales are up for the 9 mos. I'm Starlight-11/4/1999
8517 Jmar Technologies Reports Third Quarter Results SAN DIEGO--(BUSINESS WIREPaul Lee-11/4/1999
8516 SCALPEL technology being developed: Joint Development Agreement Announced to AStarlight-11/3/1999
8515 jmarw showed some life today 48200 (well more like 24100 actually) traded athenry jakala-11/2/1999
8514 HIFN was not a carve out! It was a spinoff which means that STAC lost the subsBilberry-10/31/1999
8513 Paul, I looked at both charts (STAC and HIFN) -- STAC appeared to be a $24-30 sPDL-10/31/1999
8512 While you are polling look what happened last January when STAC (a $2 stock) spPaul Lee-10/31/1999
8511 I don't agree. Since the carve-out is off of JMAR, analysts will certainly Richaaard-10/31/1999
8510 Richaard, the carve out would be a new issue. There are a lot of firms that brBilberry-10/31/1999
8509 It's going to be difficult to do a carve-out because who will buy it? In moRichaaard-10/30/1999
8508 it has now been 2 years since we last reached the heights of 4+ and now we apphenry jakala-10/29/1999
8507 thanks richaaard - i doubt it'll ever come to considering "the ledge&qhenry jakala-10/27/1999
8506 Henry, you'll always have us for support, so if being a JMAR shareholder geRichaaard-10/27/1999
8505 only cynical - howabout outright depressing ? talk on the yahoo board by a grehenry jakala-10/27/1999
8504 Good point. I forgot about that. And I bet the milestones are based on actual aDave Lippert-10/27/1999
8503 Richaaard, I'm in the dark re: TA, and, after only 3+ years of this stuff,Lee Fredrickson-10/27/1999
8502 Now we can try for a quadruple bottom.Richaaard-10/26/1999
8501 DARPA money was based on milestones reached. Did we all miss the achievements?.Richaaard-10/26/1999
8500 JSI seems to hold the promise for JMAR's short-term future. I guess that isBilberry-10/26/1999
8499 Bilberry - I tried to access your chart and my computer came up with an error mStarlight-10/26/1999
8498 Looks like JMAR is forming a triple bottom on the charts: tscn.comBilberry-10/26/1999
8497 I think the DARPA money is mostly gone at this point, at least if we can believDave Lippert-10/26/1999
8496 It looks like JMAR has a minimum of two years on that 13 mil from DARPA. They cRichaaard-10/25/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):