SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Knight/Trimark Group, Inc.
An SI Board Since July 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
10027 74 0 KCG
Emcee:  jacksoo Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
8527 Morgan, So why is this junk propped up, while the profitable companies are allBWAC-6/6/2000
8526 The most depressing thing about that article, is the speculated buyout price ofSir Francis Drake-6/6/2000
8525 I hear ya! This junk is just insane. You got analysts yelling fire. CNBS makingBWAC-6/6/2000
8524 Well, thank you dejavu, and a glass of port to you! Seriously, here is an articSir Francis Drake-6/6/2000
8523 <i>Man, drop me a bone. I did that analysis originally this morning.</gbh-6/6/2000
8522 Um, so Amy now thinks that NITE should be valued at the same level as Herzog waKeith J-6/6/2000
8521 Sorry Morgan. Amy will let you not get off so easily - simply lethal injection!dejavu-6/6/2000
8520 Gary, Man, drop me a bone. I did that analysis originally this morning. The RBBWAC-6/6/2000
8519 Amy's new estimate of what NITE could trade at is $7 3/4 (according to the Sir Francis Drake-6/6/2000
8518 Morgan, yes, it was 1/4. 1/4 of whatever is completely off the wall. I would gbh-6/6/2000
8517 Thanks for the links, Gary. Btw., I don't know if this resolves the AB issuSir Francis Drake-6/6/2000
8516 Three very positive articles. Why hasn't anyone posted these yet? biz.yahgbh-6/6/2000
8515 HZG customers are by no means locked into continuing to do business with HZG, jGS_Wall Street-6/6/2000
8514 See, people are misunderstanding this deal.... by MLCO buying HRZG.. they will $Mogul-6/6/2000
8513 My main concern w/ this MLCO/HRZG has never been fundamentals, but "percepSir Francis Drake-6/6/2000
8512 And there is more! Wow, sharp tone! biz.yahoo.com <<Tuesday June 6, 5:1Sir Francis Drake-6/6/2000
8511 Looks like the NITE PR machine is on the move: biz.yahoo.com Tuesday June 6, Alohal-6/6/2000
8510 Reasonable response, though one thing has got me puzzled just a little: <&lSir Francis Drake-6/6/2000
8509 Kudos to KP and gang! NITE did respond, bless their hearts! That is what I was Sir Francis Drake-6/6/2000
8508 OK - NITE RESPONDS TO THE MLCO/HRZG DEAL! knight-sec.com <<Knight TradiSir Francis Drake-6/6/2000
8507 From RB: Motley Fool take. By: jrmb Reply To: None Alohal-6/6/2000
8506 Institutions continue to accumulate cheap shares of NITE: thomsoninvest.netAlohal-6/6/2000
8505 I don't get why, in your scenario, if HRZG withers inside of ML, and then aGeorge the Greek-6/6/2000
8504 Oh yes - I see it in the market all the time. According to a recent SEC study, Sir Francis Drake-6/6/2000
8503 Interesting article about JP Morgan violating Nasdaq trading rules. biz.yahoo.gbh-6/6/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News