SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Iomega Thread without Iomega
An SI Board Since June 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
10072 15 0 IOM
Emcee:  Jock Hutchinson Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
8547 Rocky, you are so full of it. No doubt, if the devil were horny he would hire D.J.Smyth-3/26/1999
8546 << Mind you, I do understand that there's always a possibility that Ken Pomaranski-3/26/1999
8545 Ken, <i>Good words of wisdom...</i> Thanks. Coming from you, I coDavid Colvin-3/26/1999
8544 Good words of wisdom... kpKen Pomaranski-3/26/1999
8543 >>For 2 people to look at ALL THE DATA, and come up with two diametricallCogito-3/26/1999
8542 Ken, I, like you, have had the same "flaw" all my life....low toleraDavid Colvin-3/26/1999
8541 <i> Sub-$5 IOM stock prices means that many Margin calls will go out for Jock Hutchinson-3/26/1999
8540 More from the AOL Motley Fool board: Thanks to a poster with the screen name CDavid Colvin-3/26/1999
8539 << Like you, I object to people taking the attitude that those who don&#Ken Pomaranski-3/26/1999
8538 Allen, Thanks for the clarification. I <b>was</b> somewhat puzzledDavid Colvin-3/26/1999
8537 Well look what the cat dragged in. How's your QGLY these days? No, not thatFuzzFace-3/26/1999
8536 you're possibly correct. The zip drives continues to increase in numbers alD.J.Smyth-3/26/1999
8535 Pete - I think your explanation makes more sense than another one that's bCogito-3/26/1999
8534 I may grab some more in the next few days. I suspect this dip below 5 is EOQ sPete Mimmack-3/26/1999
8533 I need a drink... No, I need eight drinks...TGIF Hunter Vann-3/26/1999
8532 Get lost. David Colvin-3/26/1999
8531 BF - Just so you know, this is not the first time IOM has dipped below 5 in thCogito-3/26/1999
8530 David - I was kidding. I do not seriously believe that Ken should be laughed Cogito-3/26/1999
8529 IOM $4 3/4 Once again, my warnings as to IOM's demise fell on deaf (and ofRocky Reid-3/26/1999
8528 Come on Fred, you know his name, you share a desk at that "pump and dump&qAlan Rosen-3/26/1999
8527 Hey!!!, am I seeing right that IOM is at 43 1/4? Ooops, it's 4-3/4, not 4BubbaFred-3/26/1999
8526 Ben, Thanks for the link. Some things I found of interest From the 10-K: DurDavid Colvin-3/26/1999
8525 No; I'm not wishy washy, I have just been investing in more active stocks(BobInBush-3/26/1999
8524 All: IOM 10-K filed and available for review: freeedgar.com Ben A. Ben Antanaitis-3/26/1999
8523 Allen, Ken said he didn't want to lay out his predictions because he felt David Colvin-3/26/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News