Employee Stock Options - NQSOs & ISOs | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends
Employee Stock Options - NQSOs & ISOs

An SI Board Since June 2002

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
786	22	0

Emcee: rkral	Type: Moderated

Introduction Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Posted
86	<i>JUST PLAYING A GAME WITH THE FOLLOWING </i> Let me know when you	Stock Farmer	6/20/2002
85	Hi Gary: Thanks for your post. I believe all of us here may agree that the acc	hueyone	6/20/2002
84	The accounting professor and I still agree with JS: <i>From the professor	hueyone	6/20/2002
83	The corrected link ... Message 17578700 Ron	rkral	6/20/2002
82	<i>When I described "expected future value" I very clearly defin	rkral	6/20/2002
81	When I described "expected future value" I very clearly defined this a	Stock Farmer	6/19/2002
80	OV = PV + EV ... Option value = promise value + exercise value ... John, the r	rkral	6/19/2002
79	Ron, this is infuriating. I assert that a stock option has value, and ask wheth	Stock Farmer	6/19/2002
78	>><i>JS: Is it the conditional promise itself that has value? Or the	rkral	6/18/2002
77	Perhaps the following poster can be drawn into a discussion. Check out his prof	Gary L. Kepler	6/18/2002
76	<i>To paraphrase from a book on GAAP that I looked at yesterday - 'The	Stock Farmer	6/18/2002
75	<i>JS: Is it the conditional promise itself that has value? Or the value t	Stock Farmer	6/18/2002
74	>><i>"A promise. A piece of paper called an "Instrument of	rkral	6/17/2002
73	SBC offers case study in how CEOs get rich austin360.com Baby Bell executive&#	waitwatchwander	6/17/2002
72	I am in agreement with your analysis JS. In so much as I think the important th	hueyone	6/17/2002
71	Ron, It is far more subtle than you suggest. When an option is exercised there	Stock Farmer	6/17/2002
70	<i>"I have never claimed that we should be deducting both [edit: ...]	rkral	6/17/2002
69	Thank you for your further clarification. As I understand it, the Black Scholes	hueyone	6/17/2002
68	>>From Ron: <i>"So getting back on point .. the stock-based com	rkral	6/17/2002
67	Actually my stated 3.39 year average vesting period for Tom Siebel is too long--	hueyone	6/17/2002
66	Here is a link I left out on my list of quotes where Levin refers to company'	hueyone	6/16/2002
65	From Ron: <i>*So getting back on point .. the stock-based compensation exp	hueyone	6/16/2002
64	Ron: These quotes from Levin indicate that companies are treating stock option	hueyone	6/16/2002
63	<i>Of this 7.95M option shares, 4.75M vest in five years at the rate of 5%	rkral	6/16/2002
62	<i>The weighted average vesting period for all upper level execs listed in	hueyone	6/16/2002

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):