SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Knight/Trimark Group, Inc.
An SI Board Since July 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
10027 74 0 KCG
Emcee:  jacksoo Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
8602 <<Goldman/NITE/eTrade OR amtd combo>> not possible IMHO. The advantSir Francis Drake-6/9/2000
8601 Morgan, Just speculating but wouldn't a Goldman/NITE/eTrade OR amtd combo bmichael97123-6/9/2000
8600 michael, I'm not sure I see NITE being bought anytime soon. But perhaps somSir Francis Drake-6/9/2000
8599 Morgan, Who would you consider to be the most logical potential buyers of Nite?michael97123-6/9/2000
8598 And some more analyst comments from yesterday. Jun 8 2000 12:29PM Knight Trigbh-6/9/2000
8597 The issue is, whether owning AMTD is a net liability or asset to MER. Like I keSir Francis Drake-6/9/2000
8596 <i>Either way, I am not counting on any of this materializing.</i> gbh-6/8/2000
8595 Gary, Morgan kinda had a valid point. Check out the bigger picture. The profitBWAC-6/8/2000
8594 BWAC, Morgan slightly distorted by view of the AMTD profitability picture. I sgbh-6/8/2000
8593 <i>Now if they own AMTD, you get AMTD+MLCO+HRZG is making the full $7. A gbh-6/8/2000
8592 GBH and Morgan, (OT sorta) AMTD is profitable, or at least was last quarter byBWAC-6/8/2000
8591 <<one major issue in MER buying AMTD and internalizing its orderflow is tSir Francis Drake-6/8/2000
8590 Morgan, one major issue in MER buying AMTD and internalizing its orderflow is tgbh-6/8/2000
8589 Bob - ML employees as new customers of MLD, and the 16K number, I got from a raSir Francis Drake-6/8/2000
8588 Morgan, I think your assessment of ML is a little off. Hardly any employees arBob Kim-6/8/2000
8587 <<Wouldn't it just be cheaper to pay extra $ for order flow?>> Sir Francis Drake-6/8/2000
8586 Ricketts sees his stock as severely undervalued even back when it was $22. He aBWAC-6/8/2000
8585 BWAC - cannot happen. NITE will not acquire AMTD - KP already addressed the queSir Francis Drake-6/8/2000
8584 Great. Yet another reason to sink more money into AMTD. One problem, Merrill orBWAC-6/8/2000
8583 Grave danger to NITE -- following that report from ML, let us pull together whaSir Francis Drake-6/8/2000
8582 Interesting summary of a ML report - very positive toward NITE -- Courtesy of Sir Francis Drake-6/8/2000
8581 Greg, my experience at Datek is basically the same. I never trust them with magbh-6/8/2000
8580 Bob, I hadn't heard that Reuters (RTRSY) had planned to spin off Instinet igbh-6/8/2000
8579 I have never got a bad fill through my Schwab account, as a matter of fact on mGS_Wall Street-6/8/2000
8578 Gary, Do you think AB's anti-NITE / pro-ECN stance is related to an effortBob Kim-6/8/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News