Lightwave Logic, Inc. | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks
Lightwave Logic, Inc.

An SI Board Since August 2005

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
1812	48	0	LWLG

Emcee: XenaLives	Type: Moderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
87	I had read this before and that's why I thought they would be used together.	creede	-	10/6/2005
86	Hi Cris, They're actually kind of worlds apart. PTHO is developing what w	caly	-	10/6/2005
85	Caly - How is this tied to Fiber Optics in the Home? I've done a lot of D	creede	-	10/6/2005
84	Are you two guys mentally challenged? The nice lady said stop, so STOP IT! I	Chris Forte	-	10/6/2005
83	IMO, you have each shown equally bad behavior and judgment on this thread. The	caly	-	10/6/2005
82	I'd delete the thread if I could, and I'm sorry I ever started it. This	caly	-	10/6/2005
81	You have to be insane. You post that you are stopping posting to me and yet you	rrufff	-	10/6/2005
80	rrufff~~I feel sorry for you. You must be a terribly lonely person who doesn	reserectorman	-	10/6/2005
79	I haven't been communicating with you. My posts referring to the great poten	rrufff	-	10/6/2005
78	rrufff~~I'm content not to have to deal with you anymore. I don't consi	reserectorman	-	10/6/2005
77	I can't understand why you consider my posts an attack. I am free to expres	rrufff	-	10/5/2005
76	rrufff~~Caly wants us to stop this, so why don't you stop? Quit attacking m	reserectorman	-	10/5/2005
75	Caly - I looked back to see how this little flame war started. Since resorectma	rrufff	-	10/5/2005
74	Caly~~Firstly, I thought you said that rrufff and I were to cease and desist. I	reserectorman	-	10/2/2005
73	Fine with me, I suspect he's involved with the PR people not the company any	rrufff	-	10/2/2005
72	Caly~~No problem!	reserectorman	-	10/2/2005
71	If you two want to continue to go at it, please take it to private messages. T	caly	-	10/2/2005
70	rruff~~You are truly clueless and can hear nothing over the sound of your own se	reserectorman	-	10/1/2005
69	Of course, your post shows how little you know. Look at some of my other posts	rrufff	-	10/1/2005
68	rrrufff~~I'm no politician. I can simply see the advantage of using multipl	reserectorman	-	10/1/2005
67	You sound a bit like our politicians who say we can have 2 wars, 100's of bi	rrufff	-	10/1/2005
66	rrufff~~In any case, it is fruitless to continue our conversation as long as you	reserectorman	-	9/30/2005
65	reufff~~It appears that my very good post to you was deleted for what ever reaso	reserectorman	-	9/30/2005
64	First priority is to keep the share count down. They have no money at this poin	rrufff	-	9/30/2005
63	rrufff~~Why do automatically leap to an "either-or" mentality. Both c	reserectorman	-	9/30/2005

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):