SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Clarify - upside to EPS
An SI Board Since September 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1062 8 0 CLFY
Emcee:  Clam Clam Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
87 What do you all think of SCOP and RMDY? Are they direct competitors to CLFY? Alec Epting-4/15/1997
86 To all: the conference call number is, 800-633-8284 and the code # is 2670607Clam Clam-4/15/1997
85 Thanks for your response, but I was only talking about how the news gets all miemichael-4/15/1997
84 Should someone play a bounce tomorrow, well you better study INFR, SWRT, and ATzTrader_77-4/15/1997
83 I fell bad for all that own this. Great earnings but the prospect of no growth joshi-4/15/1997
82 Yea, check out the same situation with ATEA, INFR, SWRT, on so on.zTrader_77-4/15/1997
81 That is not manipulation. The company's growth has stopped. If you go pubClam Clam-4/15/1997
80 The market is getting rough. I just noticed a stock "Clarify" thaemichael-4/15/1997
79 Reasonable valuation now. Not clear to me why I would buy CLFY at this price, Shege Dambanza-3/5/1997
78 reasonable price now???? or free fall? rtrita labella-3/5/1997
77 A reasonable price, I think.Shege Dambanza-2/19/1997
76 A little quiet on this thread. Any comments concerning the recent weakness? DPaul Kim-2/19/1997
75 I believe Qualcomm had purchased ClearSales. There are others, but I can'tShege Dambanza-1/26/1997
74 You are probably right. I forgot all about that Metropolis situation. I figurseth thomas-1/25/1997
73 Your comment about A/R increasing is a good one. I wonder if a major contributShege Dambanza-1/25/1997
72 This is a copy of my post on VNTV: For Morgan Stanley, is HOLD sort of an &quoseth thomas-1/25/1997
71 thanks...boy, you're gonna love this....first, again, my "PSYCLE sm&quJim Goodman-1/22/1997
70 thanks....o.k., one "PSYCLE sm" key to the 'short" side, is Jim Goodman-1/22/1997
69 Jim, Congradulations on your path of riches...sometimes its seems so easy...beithomas todd bishop-1/18/1997
68 thanks for sharing. And, as for the industries where this might be happening .Jeffrey Margolis-1/17/1997
67 the simplest suggestion I can share with you, in the too small space here, is tJim Goodman-1/17/1997
66 I'm interested (unless you're trying to sell me something). What otherJeffrey Margolis-1/16/1997
65 hi, Jeff....FYI, if you do the historical studying I have done to develop my &qJim Goodman-1/16/1997
64 The following is off the AOL BB: Subj: Re:stock would bounce to 42 Date: Mohammad Khan-1/15/1997
63 Mr. Clam, I got the press release off the news feature on my prodigy account, tB. Pasternak-1/15/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News