SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Visible Genetics Inc.(VGIN)
An SI Board Since October 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
337 16 0 VGIN
Emcee:  Piotr Koziol Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
87 Ah, one down, many, many to come......... prnewswire.com Go, Stevens/Garey, gscaram(o)uche-9/11/1997
86 +3/8 on 1000 shares is $375 minus two commissions (Schwab @ $29.95 each for up Richard Haugland-9/11/1997
85 Nope, don't know of any analysts that cover them. There's an analyst ascaram(o)uche-9/10/1997
84 Thanks, apparently my welcome is worn out at that site, having registered previRichard Haugland-9/10/1997
83 You can register for two weeks free at the site. I did, so I can answer your qscaram(o)uche-9/10/1997
82 Phastmike, I cannot access the article on thestreet.com (pay service). Is therRichard Haugland-9/10/1997
81 also article on thestreet.com on visible todayphastmike-9/10/1997
80 VGINF acquires reference testing lab for 90,000 shares and $90,000. biz.yahoo.Richard Haugland-9/10/1997
79 In the weekly insider report of 9/5/97, one director of VGINF is reported as haRichard Haugland-9/7/1997
78 I have been "buying on dips" and started at $5.00 with most at $6.50 Richard Haugland-9/5/1997
77 Income from Sales seems to be required to get Visible Genetics the respect it dPhil Cressman-9/5/1997
76 I was surprised that the MM gave me 1000 shares at $7 at 4:14 PM today, well afRichard Haugland-8/25/1997
75 Did anyone not the article on aids in fridays nyt where a research at Glaxo wasphastmike-8/25/1997
74 Just misc. chatter, nothing new......... I really like yesterday's (Fridayscaram(o)uche-8/23/1997
73 my understanding is the "cost" of the license was the "option&quphastmike-8/21/1997
72 Second quarter earnings of VGINF: biz.yahoo.com probably about in line with eRichard Haugland-8/21/1997
71 <<as a matter of fact I've never owned a biotech which made much moneRichard Haugland-8/21/1997
70 My comments on VMRX are in the misc.invest.stocks archives, probably around Falscaram(o)uche-8/20/1997
69 Off Topic - Opinions on VMRX I am wondering If my own recent excitement with VHelen MacMillan-8/20/1997
68 Agree that earnings are not important. This small biotech has plenty of cash anTed Downs-8/20/1997
67 imho, earnings not important tomorrow, sales would be nice, sales this current phastmike-8/20/1997
66 I'm in this sucker for the kits, particularly the HIV genotyping. So, Iscaram(o)uche-8/20/1997
65 With earnings out tomorrow could go either way. Obviously there must have beenRichard Haugland-8/20/1997
64 I really like that the dip this morning occurred on such light volume. Geze, scaram(o)uche-8/20/1997
63 I completely agree on the positive aspects of the Roche "option."Richard Haugland-8/20/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News