SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
NANO
An SI Board Since February 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2272 39 0 NANO
Emcee:  Norrin Radd Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
872 Hiram, sorry but You are not providing me INSIGHT here - just Your OPINION. ThaCrossy-8/13/1997
871 Peter, NANO should be pretty well positioned in this 300mm segment... best wisCrossy-8/13/1997
870 PLEASE stick to the topic--NANO!Bill Driscoll-8/13/1997
869 Crossy,let me give you some insight here. Fiscal policy and monetary policy is Hiram Walker-8/13/1997
868 Not to interrupt the macro discussion but, I heard the CEO of AMAT on CNBC todPeter Goss-8/13/1997
867 Hiram, I don't think it's correct to determine macroeconomic policy by Crossy-8/13/1997
866 Crossy, the small stocks,especially tech stocks have not been as good an investHiram Walker-8/13/1997
865 Hiram, well competetive devaluation ahead ? I don't subscribe to this as hCrossy-8/13/1997
864 Hi JDN and Crossy, >So long as Chairman owns MAJORITY of stock there is no Wade-8/13/1997
863 JDN,all I can say is the volatility is telling of something coming much more seHiram Walker-8/13/1997
862 Crossy, this time will be different. The BOJ had interest rates down to about 1Hiram Walker-8/13/1997
861 Hi EG, Yes, the 5 year chart really bring up the beautiful cup formation. I hopWade-8/13/1997
860 Hi Wade, Just thought I would post the 5 year chart...........it's lovely.E. Graphs-8/13/1997
859 Wade, FLK cannot acquire NANO without the old man's (CEO I mean) consent, sCrossy-8/13/1997
858 Hiram, sorry about my stepping in but the central bank (of Japan) gave rise toCrossy-8/13/1997
857 Hi Wade, I am pretty sure it is not some well known company. Also, I heard lee wang-8/13/1997
856 Dear Hiram: Do you not have something tucked away in Y2K companies to take advJDN-8/13/1997
855 Milton,thats why I have shifted to companies like NANO,CHML,BAY. I am going witHiram Walker-8/13/1997
854 Dear Hiram: I dont wish to argue with you but you are looking at the Symptom aJDN-8/13/1997
853 Dear Wade: So long as Chairman owns MAJORITY of stock there is no chance of taJDN-8/13/1997
852 Hi Doug, >Crazy as it sounds, I just have the feeling that NANO may buy a &Wade-8/13/1997
851 Hi Doug, AMAT report was unexpectedly strong, 11 cents above high estimate, thidia oko-8/13/1997
850 Milton, You are right on the money ("The stocks lined up for the fall are Christopher Brainard-8/13/1997
849 Wade, Guys this is crazy- isn't there supposed to be a pullback in tech stDouglas V. Fant-8/13/1997
848 Hi Lee, >They said there is one competitor to >their 300 mm technology, Wade-8/12/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News