SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Loral Space & Communications
An SI Board Since April 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
10852 82 0 LOR
Emcee:  Don Limb Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
8727RS: Loral asleep at the wheel still? Great we keep the corporate training accounJeff Vayda-11/20/2000
8726Jeff, I think the PR issues can be handled if the BK is to a large degree pre-paA.L. Reagan-11/20/2000
8725RE/MAX Real Estate Upgrades 1,200-Site Corporate Network With Latest Satellite TRocket Scientist-11/20/2000
8724A.L.; I continue to be in the camp that believes the SPs were more concerned wiJeff Vayda-11/20/2000
8723Ah, Jeff, indeed no fiery end apparently. And I 100% agree that LOR's inteA.L. Reagan-11/20/2000
8722Someone asked about morale at LOR awhile back. This may be a representative commValueman-11/20/2000
8721A.L. Reagan: better dig out from those accounting papers every now and then and Jeff Vayda-11/20/2000
8720I am trying to ascertain where you are hearing this from: >>>I keep Tahoetech-11/20/2000
8719Tahoetech,when you state "you do not hear this from..." are you referedefendall-11/19/2000
8718As I have exhausted myself trying to unveil the intentions of wingcast the commoTahoetech-11/19/2000
8717The pro-forma write off of G* assets assumes a value of zero for G*. However, eKyrosL-11/18/2000
8716R.S. absolutely correct that the definition of "tangible book value" iA.L. Reagan-11/18/2000
8715In your calculation of "tangible book value" aren't you really valRocket Scientist-11/18/2000
8714Defendall, I agree with your point. I agree with Jim that G* will not soon shareA.L. Reagan-11/18/2000
8713IMO, now that Loral and Q control the plurality of G* debt and equity, a more plKyrosL-11/18/2000
8712Jim,you miss one important aspect to your calculation. Debt removal.If only for defendall-11/18/2000
8711I just don't believe a G* bk is in the works. First, I am convinced the sp&Jim Parkinson-11/18/2000
8710<i>Looks to me like Lor just bought G* another 3 years unless they themselA.L. Reagan-11/17/2000
8709LOR pro-forma tangible book value per share of common @ 9/30/00 appears to be a A.L. Reagan-11/17/2000
8708Looks to me like Lor just bought G* another 3 years unless they themselves pull Jim Parkinson-11/17/2000
8707Kind of answered my own question. Here's a link to the $500MM G* facility, iA.L. Reagan-11/17/2000
8706This was a good move by LOR as they'd be paying the $500 million anyway, in A.L. Reagan-11/17/2000
8705I don't think it matters anymore what happens to G* as far as the T6/T7 collRocket Scientist-11/17/2000
8704Who Gets the sats if G* goes belly-up? banks or Loral ?ebg51-11/17/2000
8703While not surprising, I certainly consider this to be excellent news for Loral aRocket Scientist-11/17/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News