SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
NETM: Whats the BEEF?
An SI Board Since January 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2599 17 0 NETM
Emcee:  Steven S. Harris Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
874 Some beaten-down stocks really took off today (QDEK, DIMD), while WNDR, SYMC, Xjim A-9/19/1996
873 Jim, As I said earlier those puts you seen active as a bearish sign is a actualChuck Stremski-9/19/1996
872 Walt Amarals response (below) to my shareholder concerns: "We are obviousjim A-9/19/1996
871 Hi Jim I haven't posted for awhile, but I still have some NETM. I sold moBrander-9/17/1996
870 ChucK, My only position is long. I have no calls or puts. I agree with simply ojim A-9/17/1996
869 Jim, You can look at puts rising as a contrary indicator. If people are bettingChuck Stremski-9/17/1996
868 Chuck, why the sudden change in heart. A few days ago you we're convinced tjim A-9/17/1996
867 Jim, A note of caution here. If we don't break 7 5/8 soon, which was set onChuck Stremski-9/17/1996
866 I agree with your point of view on the tech. and fundamental, but a rev. growthharjanto joey sudibjo-9/17/1996
865 Habib, i meant 0.04 or less next Q. NETM down another 1/2 to 8. Chuck may be rijim A-9/16/1996
864 Habib, The 0.4 (or possibly a small loss) for this Q is from OLDE and Smith Barjim A-9/16/1996
863 Personal Information Manager-- basically a personal organizational tool that NEHabib Wicks-9/16/1996
862 What's a PIM? John ChattertonJohn Chatterton-9/16/1996
861 I think you are wrong about a .04 profit. This is what NETM pulled in a bad quaHabib Wicks-9/16/1996
860 Habib, I agree with most of what you've said and think NETM is well positiojim A-9/16/1996
859 Nobody on this list seems to be discussing Netmanages' products and how theHabib Wicks-9/16/1996
858 Jim, MM means Market Makers. All stocks are manipulated. How much and to whChuck Stremski-9/13/1996
857 Chuck, I tend to agree and if we see another spike to 9.5-10 i will sell (I shojim A-9/13/1996
856 Jim, I don't care if it goes back to 20 as long as it hits 6 first. ThatChuck Stremski-9/13/1996
855 Options activity bearish. 7.5 and 10 calls were all down and 10, 12.5 PUTS werejim A-9/13/1996
854 Chuck, You may be right. This stock is acting very weak. After good announcemenjim A-9/13/1996
853 Jim, I use to like NETM and had an average price of 8 1/2. The last pop up it hChuck Stremski-9/13/1996
852 NETM is flat/down toady even as NADAQ skyrockets 20pts and entire software grojim A-9/13/1996
851 The only problem I think is Microsoft.Xue-Feng Yang-9/13/1996
850 Jschick, He said nothing about Q3 (only OLDE and Smith Barney are predicting fljim A-9/12/1996
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News