SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
LTX Corp. (LTXX)
An SI Board Since February 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2126 38 0 LTXX
Emcee:  sallyu Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
876 Hi all. LTX stock has been getting some attention recently. I've heard otDavid S.-9/25/1997
875 Great to see LTXX move on positive news, for a change. Especially on a down daB Hewson-9/24/1997
874 *OFF TOPIC (sort of)* I came across this post on the Innovex (INVX) thread jusJack Be Quick-9/24/1997
873 More news for those who haven't seen it: Samsung order for multiple SynchrJack Be Quick-9/24/1997
872 John, I was unable to find any historical recommendations at the Cowen site. Greg Thornton-9/23/1997
871 John, I just looked at it this morning, but now it has changed to recommendatiGreg Thornton-9/23/1997
870 Greg, I too was referring to the stock (by its symbol, LTXX) in my previous poJack Be Quick-9/23/1997
869 John, Apparently, the Daewoo thing was (allegedly) some sort of a scam pulled Greg Thornton-9/23/1997
868 Greg, thanks. I had scanned back through the list of previous messages, but misJack Be Quick-9/23/1997
867 John, LTX alleges that a representative of Daewoo misrepresented their intentiGreg Thornton-9/22/1997
866 Thanks very much for your long and thought-provoking analysis. Much appreciateB Hewson-9/22/1997
865 Link to company news regarding their lawsuit against Daewoo: biz.yahoo.com AnJack Be Quick-9/22/1997
864 According to Lombard LTXX has a pe of 6 Mikemike linnihan-9/21/1997
863 B - Sorry if I was snappish in my previous post. In answer to your question regJack Be Quick-9/21/1997
862 Fortunately, I bought CMOS at 23, not 54, where it closed today. I am new to LB Hewson-9/19/1997
861 Why can't they be overlooked? Who has said that investors must give LTX thGreg Thornton-9/19/1997
860 >>This is a reasonably big company -- they can't be overlooked if CMOJack Be Quick-9/19/1997
859 John and Greg, what is wrong with this LTXX picture? You say the market doesn&B Hewson-9/18/1997
858 Yes, I too thought that was interesting. I was halfway expecting to see anotheGreg Thornton-9/18/1997
857 Greg, thanks for the info. Also, did you notice that LTX REPEATED their press Jack Be Quick-9/18/1997
856 John, Shlumberger supplies mostly digital IC test equipment. They are not a mGreg Thornton-9/18/1997
855 Just found a link to something posted on another thread about Schlumberger testJack Be Quick-9/18/1997
854 Shhh...don't let them know that we care or they'll keep being mean to uJack Be Quick-9/18/1997
853 Gail, $4 1/2 to $7 1/2 is most of a double -- congratulations! I don't reGreg Thornton-9/17/1997
852 Technically LTXX picture has weakened, it is slightly below its 50 DMA and tryivegetarian-9/17/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News