SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Knight/Trimark Group, Inc.
An SI Board Since July 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
10027 74 0 KCG
Emcee:  jacksoo Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
8777Morgan, Do you see any possibility of a buyback? Does anyone think the company George the Greek-7/27/2000
8776Thanks, Morgan. As I remember from former posts of yours you trade NITE both waydejavu-7/26/2000
8775dejavu - due to the "pooling of interests" acquisition of Arbitrade, nSir Francis Drake-7/26/2000
8774Morgan, your assessment is, as always, well founded. I am ready to say goodbye tdejavu-7/26/2000
8773Recent earnings releases underscore a key fact: those companies whose business eSir Francis Drake-7/26/2000
8772Question: Isn't decimalization going to transpire very very soon???? when arthomas odonoghue-7/25/2000
8771I have been following LAB for quite some time, and have occasionally commented oSir Francis Drake-7/25/2000
8770Some 85 IPO's are slated to go off over the next 3 weeks.....If they preformdumbandstupid-7/23/2000
8769I also listened to CC....one thing is clear...You like those big earnings of thedumbandstupid-7/23/2000
8768Finally just listened to the CC. 6 trading day losses in the quarter. 3 were mgbh-7/21/2000
8767ALL, Market Makers in general are making a killing on the spread between COMS PGS_Wall Street-7/21/2000
8766You are addressing yourself to me? I haven't been a "frequent commentatSir Francis Drake-7/21/2000
8765Gee..I wonder what Fiberman now has to say about ZD....Bouf-7/21/2000
8764The general tenor of more frequent commentators [* L to the power of 2] on this William H. Ferguson-7/20/2000
8763I do not think that NITE revised anything but they were correcting inaccurate revestor-7/20/2000
8762I am shocked at today's movement.I lost money today because I read that NITmanny t-7/20/2000
8761At a 10 multiple with growth intact of course it is green. Lets hope we can get michael97123-7/20/2000
8760Would you PLAESE hit me on the head??? I just want to make sure that I am seeinfiberman-7/20/2000
8759He is all of that. What bothers me is that the case he makes on 7/3 should be mamichael97123-7/20/2000
8758That guy has an incurable obsession with NITE mostly to the down side. His argumGS_Wall Street-7/20/2000
8757Morgan just wiped out the Raging Bull thread with a reprint of his 7/3 diatribe.michael97123-7/20/2000
8756The Market Makers are taking advantage of the down Market and Option expiration manny t-7/19/2000
8755We are taking it up the A@@ again (down another 5%)!!!!! What are you talking afiberman-7/19/2000
8754All things considered.....NAZ down 100.....earning did not meet whisper, it traddumbandstupid-7/19/2000
8753Just a quick check on my model for NITE. I had 21.293M shares traded vs actual GS_Wall Street-7/19/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News