SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Quantech (QQQQ)
An SI Board Since September 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
338 4 0 QQQQ
Emcee:  Phil Lachmann Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
88 Mike, Ditto on good news wishes for QQQQ. Must be some big holders dumping laBrian Johnson-4/14/1997
87 I was surprised to see how long it held up after doubling the amount of shares.M.Hicks-4/12/1997
86 Michael, Yep, it seems to be "dump time" for a lot of people on thisBrian Johnson-4/11/1997
85 It's a little tough to get exited about this baby unless some great news coed-4/10/1997
84 Does anybody know why the recent jump in volume the last two days? Recap 4/0Michael Pusateri-4/10/1997
83 Michael, I do recall that. Sitting like a rock at .30, with no uptick at alBrian Johnson-4/8/1997
82 Brian, I also noticed this a while back and sent some messages to the CEO and Michael Pusateri-4/7/1997
81 Michael, Under a search in Yahoo quotes, I found a 2/13/97 report from QuantecBrian Johnson-4/7/1997
80 Michael, Quite a QQQQ drop! Thanks for the heads up. Any idea when earnings Brian Johnson-4/7/1997
79 Any news that is expected to come out! Stock is down -.09 cents! Ouch! MichaMichael Pusateri-4/7/1997
78 Drift, drift, drift (down)... .38; Well, maybe I'll put in an order GTC atBrian Johnson-4/3/1997
77 Matt, Thanks for the clarification on the NASDAQ rules. Looks like our friDouglas Hayman-3/27/1997
76 Thanks Brian for pointing me here. I'll keep up the fatith. RickRick Hansen-3/27/1997
75 Well, it dropped back down (and then some) today, so yesterday's high was pMatt D.-3/25/1997
74 Brian, Yes, your assessmnet is probably correct. I thought that there was Douglas Hayman-3/25/1997
73 Doug, Probably whoever the specialist could sucker in (ethical or not)? Ah...Brian Johnson-3/25/1997
72 Yeah guys, real puzzling. I saw a 5000 block trade @ 3:41 for .56.........maybDouglas Hayman-3/25/1997
71 I can't figure it out either. I show the last trade at .56 (5000 shares atMatt D.-3/24/1997
70 I am showing QQQQ ended up .12 cents! Although when I look at the sales on theMichael Pusateri-3/24/1997
69 Mike, Sounds like the standard Quantech brushoff. How can we be so excited whBrian Johnson-3/23/1997
68 Brian; I check in from time to time to see what's happening. No one has mM.Hicks-3/21/1997
67 Doug, Well, they've made it easy to get frustrated. Best, BJBrian Johnson-3/20/1997
66 Brian, Thanks for you advice. I'm talking more out of frustrated anticDouglas Hayman-3/19/1997
65 Doug, I'm not dumping, as with taxes and all (& with the staff theyBrian Johnson-3/19/1997
64 Dear Snow, I'm in long term, but it's the lack of communication that IBrian Johnson-3/19/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News