SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
QGLY - Funny Name Great Product.
An SI Board Since November 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
8960 22 0 QGLY
Emcee:  David R. Helms Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
8810 He <i>is</i> a shareholder - the biggest one! From your own articlJames M. Bash-3/3/1999
8809 With a last name like that...it's a pity you don't agree. Did you thinRichard Miller-3/3/1999
8808 It was a great article. Thanks Richard, for the link. Guess Q is keeping thdrakes353-3/3/1999
8807 That is a terrific article - very thorough and even-handed. I don't draw tJames M. Bash-3/3/1999
8806 Must reading. A Philadelphia Magazine new article on Guy and Wendy and Quigley.Richard Miller-3/3/1999
8805 I thought so... just keeping you company in here....cough cough hack hack... I Skywatcher-3/2/1999
8804 Quiet in here.....where have all the bulls gone? This is still an $80 stock isdrakes353-3/2/1999
8803 WHL: Over the last 12 months it's really, really tough to come up with a &drakes353-2/22/1999
8802 Lets see. Only $.18 per share this quarter. Only $2.5 million or so. At $5.00WHL-2/22/1999
8801 Drakes Good point--I overlooked. If you received millions off the top, and youRichard Miller-2/20/1999
8800 Richard: How 'bout that decline in net margins? Yowser! Notice they onlydrakes353-2/20/1999
8799 Eric: BM ain't no CE. There will be no firestorm of press on BM. They cadrakes353-2/20/1999
8798 Yes indeed--it works for me too. So by spending an extra $4,000,000 in advertisRichard Miller-2/19/1999
8797 Drakes....I think you're missing the obvious master plan of the self-servinRichard Miller-2/19/1999
8796 Drakes,,,,I'll bet a gum ball that as soon as the company has bought back Ironyman-2/19/1999
8795 Bitter, bitter, bitter. Instead of cheerleading on this CC why don't youdrakes353-2/19/1999
8794 Hey drake, there is a Quigley conference call today at 2:00pm est. phone numberKen Fallon-2/19/1999
8793 Because it works, for a lot of people. Me included! James M. Bash-2/19/1999
8792 The CNXS comparison is more along the lines of..... * Hot, hot, hot product godrakes353-2/19/1999
8791 CNXS had no patent. They admitted this from the beginning. The comparison is iWHL-2/19/1999
8790 WHL: Yep, I'm "wrong" about this stock. Been "wrong" drakes353-2/19/1999
8789 Drakes: You are incorrect about this stock. This stock has a trailing P/E of WHL-2/19/1999
8788 The thread is alive, but this stock won't be much longer. Those earnings! drakes353-2/19/1999
8787 With the Qtr due out any time now.......Just thought someone should keep this Ironyman-2/16/1999
8786 Perhaps you should see to it that QGLY hires Liviakis. The man can work magic drakes353-2/10/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News