SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Loral Space & Communications
An SI Board Since April 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
10852 82 0 LOR
Emcee:  Don Limb Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
8852Thanks for the post; you have been wise to reduce your stake while I've beenTMann-12/28/2000
8851Rock, I hear you,good points as usual. However, if you can pull off the right cothomas-archer-12/28/2000
8850It's been a long time since I posted anything on the LOR thread and PLEASE djim black-12/28/2000
8849I believe SS/L is building Ka band sats for IpStar and "WildBlue." TRocket Scientist-12/28/2000
8848Rock, re overpaying for Cyberstar, Loral issued about 20 million shares at 20 anthomas-archer-12/28/2000
8847SPOT has always traded around replacement cost of the satellites except for timeValueman-12/28/2000
8846Well, I'm pretty sure that C*'s three GEOs can, when filled, generate a Rocket Scientist-12/28/2000
8845How can you extrapolate growth like that? Where does it say they will continue tValueman-12/28/2000
8844Valueman: My point was that you make broad all encompassing remarks like.. Oh!!pcstel-12/28/2000
8843VMan, I don't understand your pessimism regarding Cyberstar (fka Orion). YoRocket Scientist-12/28/2000
8842Valueman, I am not as experienced as you at valuing satellite companies but is KyrosL-12/28/2000
8841You can't compare SPOT and LOR. You can compare pieces, like Skynet or OrionValueman-12/28/2000
8840Valueman... I was wondering if you would mind giving us a valuation on SPOT usipcstel-12/27/2000
8839i guess the realities are somewhere in the middle of what the lemmings at Lehmanthomas-archer-12/27/2000
8838<i>I know you have zero trust for Loral's mgmt...</i> That is aValueman-12/27/2000
8837Hey Valueman, I know you have zero trust for Loral's mgmt but aren't youthomas-archer-12/27/2000
8836zebraspot, Wise words. Always hard to buy bottoms and sell tops. Nonetheless,dwight vickers-12/27/2000
8835<i>a slow cold war secretive CEO close to retirement</i> Now that lA.L. Reagan-12/24/2000
8834The used-to-be loudest and proudest boosters of LOR - who couldn't have lovezebraspot-12/24/2000
8833i know i will. Look at where we were a year ago and where we are today. What'TMann-12/23/2000
8832The "we" in "we were a bit up" refers to LOR holders, on whiA.L. Reagan-12/23/2000
8831>GSTRF closed right on $1.00, at least we were a bit up. Bit up, like hell, duncan moyer-12/23/2000
8830Volume spike likely a combo of tax loss selling and pre-holiday short covering. A.L. Reagan-12/22/2000
8829Anyone care to comment on the volume today? l_flynnl_flynn-12/22/2000
8828There seems to have been some confusion with my prior post. Now that the numbnewaitwatchwander-12/22/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):