SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Sepracor-Looks very promising
An SI Board Since August 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
10280 115 0 SEPR
Emcee:  rkrw Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
8855Actual TRx number is 87,045. So there was an actual increase from the TRx numbeRocky9-9/21/2005
8854as you predicted last week, an expected fall off... thanks for the numbers.... AIamarangerboy-9/20/2005
8853Some more tidbits from Lehman: Sales go to $244 MM for 2005. Peak is now a bilRobohogs-9/20/2005
8852I am on the road and do not have access to my spreadsheets and data sources. I Robohogs-9/20/2005
8851NVS pipeline highlight... biz.yahoo.com (1) On track for five major submissionkenhott-9/20/2005
8850Monday evening drum roll, waiting for the weekly numbers....Iamarangerboy-9/19/2005
8849I agree. But I do think they stated weeks of inventory in then current sales leRobohogs-9/15/2005
8848People seem to be assuming that SEPR controls stocking levels. I don't thinkBiomaven-9/15/2005
8847The reasonable thing to do would be to estimate your inventory in terms of expeckenhott-9/15/2005
8846Did SEPR ever actually say that they would be "de-stocking", or was thCrazyPete-9/15/2005
8845<i>Plus I think that there may need to be additional stocking, not use of Biomaven-9/15/2005
8844Monthly scripts: March 749 April 101,879 May 235,770 June 299,985 July 323,Rocky9-9/15/2005
8843R&D costs might be the key. They've been persistently light on spending Biomaven-9/14/2005
8842From the 10-k: "During the third and fourth quarters of 2003, we sold, on Rocky9-9/14/2005
8841What's your figure for the (non-recurring) gain on Vicuron? PeterBiomaven-9/14/2005
8840"xopenex seasonality, according to Jon's figures its been slow to turn Rocky9-9/14/2005
8839<<I would love to hear reasons that it won't happen.>> xopenex rkrw-9/14/2005
8838With the Vicuron merger closing tomorrow and scripts coming in so strongly, I thRocky9-9/13/2005
8837These script numbers are truly incredible. The TRx are almost 20% more than jusRocky9-9/12/2005
8836Irony here is I think the Prasco (never heard of them before this) ceo was the erkrw-9/12/2005
8835Jon, thanks for the data and your unselfish sharing of your time. I do not mind Iamarangerboy-9/12/2005
8834Well, it is very safe to say that this week's data will not be passed for seRobohogs-9/12/2005
8833Thanks, George. This week's Barron's listing of rating changes indicatedSidney Street-9/12/2005
8832Citigroup Investment Research SEPR: Improved risk/reward profile, upgrade to Bumopgcw-9/12/2005
8831Hi Jon. Re: <i>I also wonder if the Allegra salesforce might focus more oFiloF-9/10/2005
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News