SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
Stillwater Mining , SWC (former PGMS)
An SI Board Since June 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1336 31 0 SWC
Emcee:  Chris Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
886 Not a great day for SWC. From a technical standpoint the stock looks pretty weSunny Jim-6/23/1999
885 Tiger Fund Palladium liquidation rumours hurting PGM prices. Maybe they were aBob Howarth-6/22/1999
884 Re Canada: NAP (PDL-TSE) drill results with economically significant palladiuPtaskmaster-6/21/1999
883 Stock price sure has been weak. Crappy close today as MM or specialist or whatBob Howarth-6/18/1999
882 Thanks for info. Wish my online trading covered British, Canadian, and AustralBob Howarth-6/11/1999
881 Consider the Johnson Matthey ADR, #reply-8412123 PtaskPtaskmaster-6/11/1999
880 Very bullish article on PGM companies in today's London Financial Times, paBob Howarth-6/10/1999
879 Here is link to Johnson Matthey earnings released today, indicating strong PGM Bob Howarth-6/10/1999
878 Bob, I love it when divergences are created. Here we have PGMs moving up in a Sunny Jim-6/10/1999
877 Strength in Japan. Great for PGM prices. Demand back up for platinum there shBob Howarth-6/10/1999
876 Me too. Palladium up 4 or 5 bucks last time I checked to 352Bob Howarth-6/9/1999
875 If you think the market has misjudged SWC's potential, go ahead and buy somSunny Jim-6/9/1999
874 Where are those 9 analysts (5 strong buy, 4 buy) ? Is there a possibility thatBob Howarth-6/9/1999
873 On 1/3 ave volume, so probably (hopefully) not meaningful. (eom) Pete Mimmack-6/7/1999
872 Looks like heading south. Anyone know why? Thanks in advance. Bob Howarth-6/7/1999
871 Anyone heard about what (if anything) happened at annual meeting during the weeBob Howarth-5/28/1999
870 What seems to be happening with platinum is that since Central Banks are not loBob Howarth-5/25/1999
869 Would love to see Pd rising above Pt price - the SWC ore is 3.2/1 Pd, so that wPete Mimmack-5/24/1999
868 Thanks. Last Tuesday in London Financial Times there was a summary of the JohnBob Howarth-5/24/1999
867 Hi, Bob, Evidently someone thinks so: Message 9589330 . The J-M reef is huge,Pete Mimmack-5/24/1999
866 Is there any potential for other discoveries around their current mine? AnyoneBob Howarth-5/22/1999
865 But I'm willing to date SWC for at least a couple years, as long as theyPete Mimmack-5/15/1999
864 Another all time high today. Classic example of the cup and handle formation brMark McLeod-5/14/1999
863 New all time high today. More good things are on the way. Wonder if the witcMark McLeod-5/13/1999
862 Good point, forgot that. <eom> Pete Mimmack-5/10/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):