SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Trading IOMEGA based on technical analysis
An SI Board Since August 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1511 12 0 IOM
Emcee:  Elliot Brenner Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
886 Trufflette , Re:>>>What do you say about all of this?<<< TrHerb Fuller-6/24/1997
885 I took the opportunity to cover my July 25's and Aug 30's today at 5/isdsms-6/24/1997
884 main plus about today was ten minutes to close some block buys came through of D.J.Smyth-6/24/1997
883 > Please, let's not have any more discussion of what "likely"FuzzFace-6/24/1997
882 Calling Herb Fuller!!! What do you say about all of this?KM-6/24/1997
881 no wouldn't respond TA is invalid. oscillation i watch uses 17 vs 9 period D.J.Smyth-6/24/1997
880 Darrell, What sort of action are you seeing today? Iraisdsms-6/24/1997
879 Jon, I did not think you were short IOM. And I did follow and agree with your rFuzzFace-6/24/1997
878 By the way, I am not short IOM - I don't like betting against the longer-teJon Tara-6/24/1997
877 Yes, Edwin. I think that is implicit in any opinion that anyone ever expresses,Jon Tara-6/24/1997
876 Senthil, Sorry, but you got the wrong end of the stick. I am trying to quantifFuzzFace-6/24/1997
875 Oh. please Edwin. Stop harassing Jon. Everyone just states their opinion here aSenthil Sankarappan-6/24/1997
874 Jon, OK, so putting it all together, when you said "IOM is heading for $20FuzzFace-6/24/1997
873 Yes, that is what I mean by "likely".Jon Tara-6/24/1997
872 Jon. By "likely" do you mean it is more likely to happen than not? OrFuzzFace-6/24/1997
871 Darrell, I've stated my reason for my opinion (my initial post on "goiJon Tara-6/24/1997
870 Edwin, I think it's "likely". I don't put %probability on priJon Tara-6/24/1997
869 > but for now IOM is heading for $20 < Jon, I assume you did not qualifFuzzFace-6/24/1997
868 Jon, power lies with a question doesn't it. How can you say for certain whD.J.Smyth-6/24/1997
867 Why should we care if the aftermarket showed a "decisive selling pattern&qJon Tara-6/24/1997
866 aftermarket showed no decisive selling pattern yesterday. if IOM does reach $20D.J.Smyth-6/24/1997
865 Joe, Try one of the following... iri.snapshot.com webservices.pcquote.com oTriluminary-6/24/1997
864 Mark, where did you get the data in your post? Can you share the URL?Joe Waynick-6/23/1997
863 I think I would wait a bit. I think it will get down to 20. Of course, since yoJon Tara-6/23/1997
862 >> BTW, I think we got your market weakness. << IOM VOL 9328 - TICAlienTech-6/23/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News