SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
XXXXXXX
An SI Board Since June 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
2563 5 0
Emcee:  Joseph G. Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
888 J, Well, what do you think of Tuesday's 250 point rise. Is that the sigh Johnnyboy_zztop-9/3/1997
887 J-$ My crystal ball is cloudy. Rainsford sticks by the Bradley sell signal onJanice Shell-9/3/1997
886 J -- Protocol, hell. It is Required by the Management! Although ex-Robots wBlueCrab-9/3/1997
885 J-- Now, now, I've visited the Robots frequently of late... On <i>tJanice Shell-9/3/1997
884 J, I am quite possitive the market will fluctuate. J+Joseph G.-9/3/1997
883 J, Thanks. <<First, I'm not J, but rather D.>> This is an illuJoseph G.-9/3/1997
882 J, Limitless future in focus on Tuesday ? Up over 2% J Michael Sphar-9/3/1997
881 J+, First, I'm not J, but rather D. J is a wayward acquaintance if mine; tDavid Lawrence-9/3/1997
880 J, biz.yahoo.com Why I am not surprized? J+Joseph G.-9/2/1997
879 J, Exactly. J+Joseph G.-9/2/1997
878 <i>>>As a one-time Robot, perhaps you can enlighten me how to make David Lawrence-9/2/1997
877 J, You should have learned already: when it's 2% up, it's OK, just disJoseph G.-9/2/1997
876 J, <<what brings you to my posts ?>> Just to say "hi". &Joseph G.-9/2/1997
875 J+ Awwww... Seems we could be in for a rally today despite the NYT article, uJanice Shell-9/2/1997
874 J+ Yes, the Stock Operator is still my favorite... J Janice Shell-9/2/1997
873 J, Well good evening "Armaggedon Joe", what brings you to my posts ?Michael Sphar-9/1/1997
872 J, And, BTW, sucker is more "naive", "inexperienced", rathJoseph G.-9/1/1997
871 J, Look back at that post again. There's moooree.... J+Joseph G.-9/1/1997
870 J+ Optimists? Long-term investors? People who figure there's too much atJanice Shell-9/1/1997
869 J What should I call them? J+ From "Reminiscences of Stock Operator"Joseph G.-9/1/1997
868 J+ "Suckers" isn't <i>nice</i>. And anyway, as you Janice Shell-9/1/1997
867 J, <<xico, seeq, oakt, zran, lsi, intc, impx, iomg, cube, atml, actl, vlJoseph G.-9/1/1997
866 J, What should I call them? J+Joseph G.-9/1/1997
865 J+ Taht is waht I hope for.... But don't be churlish: the market after aJanice Shell-9/1/1997
864 J, Well, they've been buying for a long while now. But if they want to supJoseph G.-9/1/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News