SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Knight/Trimark Group, Inc.
An SI Board Since July 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
10027 74 0 KCG
Emcee:  jacksoo Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
8902Easdaq a severe disappointment... Thanks to "Spector" from the RB boaSir Francis Drake-8/18/2000
8901Sir Francis, Please include more detail in your posts(rants). Your posts(rants) michael97123-8/18/2000
8900More iX merger w/ D. Boerse news: biz.yahoo.com "Friday August 18, 9:00 aSir Francis Drake-8/18/2000
8899<OT> RE: today's Dorfman story. It was brought to my attention that thSir Francis Drake-8/17/2000
8898I wonder what those hypesters who spam NITE message boards make of today's aSir Francis Drake-8/17/2000
8897Morgan, OT-- I understand and assumed as such, but I do more swing trades thanfooledalot-8/17/2000
8896Here's some reporting on NITE: quotes.freerealtime.com "NEW YORK (JAGSir Francis Drake-8/17/2000
8895<OT>Re: LAB, no I have not traded it due to too low average trading volumeSir Francis Drake-8/17/2000
8894Morgan, Are you, or have you been, trading LAB? ffooledalot-8/17/2000
8893"tribble" - what is that? You mean, "drivel"? or maybe "Sir Francis Drake-8/17/2000
8892How long, O Lord, How long? Such tedium. Such tribble. Such triteness.John E. Stanga-8/17/2000
8891Just as yesterday's rise did not impress me, so too today's decline did Sir Francis Drake-8/17/2000
8890Once again, we are going down. It is time for another VIAGRA pill, bro!!!!! Hufiberman-8/16/2000
8889Oh Morgie, you've hurt my feelings so!! I confess, I have a "sloppy miAlohal-8/16/2000
8888I don't post because i am afraid if i do it will inspire that wordy "SiJohn E. Stanga-8/16/2000
8887Why should I dig up posts re: AMZN, Bezos, shareholder value etc., none of whichSir Francis Drake-8/16/2000
8886I did not post today because I had better things to do. With NITE up my positionGS_Wall Street-8/16/2000
8885How very amusing (and utterly predictable) that you would respond to my post to Alohal-8/16/2000
8884- Earnings are growing, revs are growing, etc... C'mon - here's the factblankmind-8/15/2000
8883No. My concern has not been revenues growth. My concern has been EARNINGS growthSir Francis Drake-8/15/2000
8882"Our goal is to generate $5 billion in revenues in five years," said EBWAC-8/15/2000
8881I can't make anything of your opinion, since I see ZIPPO evidence for it as Sir Francis Drake-8/15/2000
8880Guilty I skimmed. I was of the opinion that todays news still reiterated more inBWAC-8/15/2000
8879Huh? How does it go against my thesis? You can't be serious. Of course they Sir Francis Drake-8/15/2000
8878That news kinda goes against your thesis of slow growth in international revenueBWAC-8/15/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):