SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
PFE (Pfizer) How high will it go?
An SI Board Since June 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
9523 158 0 PFE
Emcee:  Lynn Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
89732005 - Pfizer Takes Cancer By Storm Matthew Herper, 05.16.05, 12:00 PM ET By Qualified Opinion-12/31/2005
8972Pfizer's Varenicline Receives U.S. FDA Priority Review Wednesday December 2Qualified Opinion-12/21/2005
8971Pfizer ruling leads to health care sector rotation Monday December 19, 6:55 pm EQualified Opinion-12/19/2005
8970Pfizer's Pipeline 'Remains Underappreciated' Kate DuBose Tomassi, 12Patriarch-12/19/2005
8969Well, the 25 puts I was short have not been exercised and they have not been canRobohogs-12/19/2005
8968well what does it mean?Stephen O-12/19/2005
8967>what they save on the heart attacks they give up on the cancer etc, that'Brander-12/19/2005
8966I wouldn't touch Crestor, link Link: webmd.comQualified Opinion-12/19/2005
8965All statins reduce cholesterol, depends on the dose you take. By your method CreStephen O-12/19/2005
8964It means even the effects of substantially less efficacious statins were includeQualified Opinion-12/19/2005
8963But as there is no difference in total mortality, what they save on the heart atStephen O-12/18/2005
8962Good point ! Excerpt from the review, "For women with known cardiovascular Qualified Opinion-12/18/2005
8961<b> but it does not affect total mortality</b> So, let them have loRobohogs-12/18/2005
8960<i>and radical changes in mood</i> Stephen, I think you're 100%tom pope-12/18/2005
8959Apparently, the review of the studies included all statins including statins thaQualified Opinion-12/18/2005
8958Well that "conspiracy website" article if you read it refers to this aStephen O-12/18/2005
8957Where do you find those conspiracy websites ? Those websites read like an infomeQualified Opinion-12/18/2005
8956No Statins useless for women: theomnivore.comStephen O-12/18/2005
8955Jumping Jeebus! Should I buy more PFE based on the hightened activity here? I&Hank-12/18/2005
8954Thank you Richard - eomQualified Opinion-12/18/2005
8953I copied this from your long old post: 'The most prominent cholesterol drugsStephen O-12/17/2005
895266 page judgement ded.uscourts.govRichard Saunders-12/17/2005
8951From 1999, Keeping Cholesterol Under Control by John Henkel Cholesterol is the Qualified Opinion-12/17/2005
8950Kudos to the physicians who are shouting the warning that statin drugs are beingStephen O-12/17/2005
8949Stock price was $26.89 on 12/31/2004. It will be interesting to see if $26.89 acQualified Opinion-12/17/2005
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):