SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Littlefield Corporation (LTFD)
An SI Board Since December 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
10368 19 0 LTFD
Emcee:  Crabbe Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
8993 I checked with the company this AM and the info that I posted in post #8985 is Ed Pettee-8/5/1998
8992 RE: <i>He paid the company $5,000. Although this may seem like a small amjimmy-8/5/1998
8991 RE: <i>If your scenario is true, why would Mims/Harrison turn control ovejimmy-8/5/1998
8990 I think your theory is completely off base. Either Wilson was skimming or he wJoe Master-8/5/1998
8989 Jimmy: If your scenario is true, why would Mims/Harrison turn control over to AT.K. Allen-8/5/1998
8988 Jimmy, - Your "theory" does make quite a bit of sense. At the least Market Tracker-8/4/1998
8987 Jimmy, What you say maybe true, but it still sounds like the plot to a Mario PNittany Lion-8/4/1998
8986 Maybe it's just the conspiracy theorist in me.. but.. isn't it interestjimmy-8/4/1998
8985 I read it this way- 1. Wilson agrees to refrain from selling, ......for one yeEd Pettee-8/4/1998
8984 Okay, now I'm confused as hell. (g) dax WallStBum-8/4/1998
8983 Gary: You may be right. I think a phone call to Hilliou to clarify this point wT.K. Allen-8/4/1998
8982 TK, I read the restrictions on sales a little different. It appears to me thaNittany Lion-8/4/1998
8981 <i>. Neither Wilson nor his wife can sell any of their stock within the WallStBum-8/4/1998
8980 A big thumbs up from merry ole England :) Looks like Andre and co.negotiated Jonathan Bulkeley-8/4/1998
8979 To summarize final resolution of the Wilson saga: 1. Wilson was apparently skiT.K. Allen-8/4/1998
8978 More: <i> NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises contaiNittany Lion-8/4/1998
8977 Here's the answer - see today's 8-k: On July 24, 1998, the CompanWallStBum-8/4/1998
8976 Gary-- <OFF TOPIC> I finished at 12:30 and a couple of beers till 1:00. Ed Pettee-7/31/1998
8975 I watch this and other stocks in real-time all day and BNGO is definitely undeGary K. Best-7/31/1998
8974 Thanks Ed, you're back early - you must have only played 18 instead of the Nittany Lion-7/31/1998
8973 Susan at the Home office , mentioned that all the old Board members remain withEd Pettee-7/31/1998
8972 I asked yesterday about the posting of the NEW Kecseg report on the Web site , Ed Pettee-7/31/1998
8971 Gary: Right you are. Seeing that "New" tag, I jumped to the conclusioT.K. Allen-7/31/1998
8970 Re: Board Appointments C'mon....a leading South Carolina lawyer. Of courseJonathan Bulkeley-7/31/1998
8969 Dax, That's a great question and one I'm sure we are all interested inNittany Lion-7/31/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):