SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Micro Linear (MLIN)?
An SI Board Since April 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1675 10 0 MLIN
Emcee:  Jonathan Edwards Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
900 MLIN is a buy because P/S = 2.0 with good earnings history and lots of revenuslob-9/9/1997
899 I bought right after the fall and sold 10 days ago at 9.125. Quite honestly, BRyvers-9/9/1997
898 I think that MLIN is a hold, and possibly a buy if it falls below $9. However, Bernard Levy-9/9/1997
897 I will hold for another fifteen days and will make a decision to continue to hSwamy S . Bale-9/9/1997
896 After reviewing the historical aspects of this thread, I would call for a virtutphillips-9/9/1997
895 Mark: I would advise some caution with SEEQ. I understand that the recent runuBernard Levy-9/8/1997
894 The article(which I read in MLIN webpage) says it is sampling product which goSwamy S . Bale-9/8/1997
893 I sold all my position today due to semi- sector slump. I feel sorry for MLIN tSamuel Lee-9/8/1997
892 Bernard - Got it. I'm suprised it didn't turn up on any of the wire seMark-9/8/1997
891 Mark: To see the Sept. 2 press release on the ML6697, just click on the Press Bernard Levy-9/8/1997
890 Bernard - "the new Fast Ethernet Chip (ML6697) that MLIN released last weMark-9/8/1997
889 Dear Hollywood: Thanks for the compliment, but pay careful attention to the coBernard Levy-9/8/1997
888 Hi Frank: I was not aware of the fact that MLIN lagged so far behind in procesBernard Levy-9/8/1997
887 Thank you Bernard, That was the type of intelligent answer I was hoping for whHollywood-9/8/1997
886 gary, i am also on the applied magnetics thread...i think it's a bit more cflickerful-9/8/1997
885 flickerful, for full disclosure, just look at the news from WSJI. Here we can Gary Ku-9/8/1997
884 gary... i would suggest full disclosure before going any further on this one.flickerful-9/8/1997
883 There you go again. You picked up another loser. Just because RTI gaped down 4-scope-9/8/1997
882 Longfellow, just check Zack's evaluation for RTI, you'll find the big vGary Ku-9/7/1997
881 Good points. The problems I see with MLIN are related to their lack of cuttingFrank Roso-9/7/1997
880 <RTI moves up and down fast> I suggest you read Reuters news regarding Bolongfellow-9/7/1997
879 Sorry Guys: I'm afraid I hurt his feelings.scope-9/7/1997
878 Hi Frank and Swamy: I don't think that the upgrade of MXIM and LLTC was liBernard Levy-9/6/1997
877 Well, if they upgrade MXIM and LLTC, that means it is time to sell the stock anSwamy S . Bale-9/6/1997
876 When you have confidence in a stock, you feel free to play up and down without Gary Ku-9/6/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News