SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Presstek -- Stock of the Decade??
An SI Board Since March 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
11098 20 0 PRST
Emcee:  SI (no user) Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
9023 Yes: In fact I am considering increasing at these levels. There is no supportpaul abramowitz-4/9/1998
9022 I sort of assumed that you had closed out all or part of your short position, aE-4/9/1998
9021 Scott, Thanks for the tip regarding web 3000. Just installed it and it works gPaul Casi-4/9/1998
9020 That should of read ..."stood by my criticism of...". What do you thiPierre Panet-Raymond-4/9/1998
9019 As you know, the standard way of ridiculing someone's English on this threaE-4/9/1998
9018 I don't understand the question. Broker involved for what? Who is Don'sE-4/9/1998
9017 Scott: I look forward to q1 results. If you are right that Prst earns 12 centspaul abramowitz-4/9/1998
9016 Sorry, I didn't realize what BWG stood for. But I do stand by NYSE Bob'Pierre Panet-Raymond-4/9/1998
9015 ALL ***OFF TOPIC**** This is a cool product and seems to work well, really kicSG-4/9/1998
9014 Paul, I would guess that this Q will earn at least half of that (.24). That wouSG-4/9/1998
9013 Jim: Okay, I can't disagree with the disclosure, you are correct. The use paul abramowitz-4/9/1998
9012 Dear JM, Thanks. (Is Don's secretary still the broker involved?)James C. Shircliff-4/8/1998
9011 Dear Paul and Scott, Check further down in the 10K in the exhibits. SpecificalJames C. Shircliff-4/8/1998
9010 I thought of answering it, but decided you were joking. But since you're noE-4/8/1998
9009 Paul, thanks SG <eom> thats "end of message" for the impaired oSG-4/8/1998
9008 James: The 10 k shows 44 cents fully diluted. paul abramowitz-4/8/1998
9007 Could be. The Tucker was a man way ahead of his time. I hope prst isnt on thElwood-4/8/1998
9006 Dear Elwood, That's what they reported ... 47 cents. But, if you look insidJames C. Shircliff-4/8/1998
9005 Dear JM, I guess you didn't answer my question 'cause I'm right! NJames C. Shircliff-4/8/1998
9004 Well, of course you would feel happy, Father, being a kindly old person of the E-4/8/1998
9003 I am happy someone still revere the right things in life.Father E.-4/8/1998
9002 I don't. The writings styles are way too different. Jason M and Nanny are Father E.-4/8/1998
9001 I also noticed it. Also did you notice how they are away during the declines buFather E.-4/8/1998
9000 Dear JM and Pierre, I know that Neil and Nanny are not the same person. But howJames C. Shircliff-4/8/1998
8999 Wow, Pierre what the heck was <i>that</i> about?, nysebob was makinE-4/8/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):