SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Applied Magnetics Corp
An SI Board Since September 1995
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
12298 24 0 APM
Emcee:  Raymond Thomas Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
9048 Assuming demand exceeds suppy, there would be limited preasure on APM to drop pHarve Wolfe-10/12/1997
9047 While I'm optomistic about this quarter's results, I don't believe Zakrosian-10/12/1997
9046 Re: Rule 10b-5 Language (Off Topic) Start at law.uc.edu Go to the link at secProton-10/12/1997
9045 >>waywayofftopic<< thank you richard, for the huge grin i have... flickerful-10/12/1997
9044 Brian -- re it is my understanding that it is required by law for companies to Dwight E. Karlsen-10/12/1997
9043 **OFF TOPIC** I've done my time in Thailand as well; unfortunately, mostlymarc chatman-10/12/1997
9042 ***OFF TOPIC*** I was thinking I should post it to you. I have a lot of intereRichard Haugland-10/12/1997
9041 Great post. <b>Now</b> who has the esoteric reading list? eommarc chatman-10/12/1997
9040 >>Where is Rule 10b-5 found? << Any basic text on securities law omarc chatman-10/12/1997
9039 ***WAY Off Topic*** Reprinted from the Bangkok Post (Trink's column) OctobRichard Haugland-10/12/1997
9038 JSB, I believe those statements were made on this thread, based on "telepMike Taylor-10/12/1997
9037 Marc, Where is Rule 10b-5 found? Sounds very interesting. MikeMike Taylor-10/12/1997
9036 This could be a factor, but lets not forget that Crisman says they are operatinJSB-10/12/1997
9035 Marc and Brian, I thought I remembered Seagate as a customer so I went to APM&#Richard Haugland-10/12/1997
9034 >>required by law for companies to inform the public if they will not meemarc chatman-10/12/1997
9033 APM's customers from its website: Maxtor Corporation, Micropolis (S) Pte. marc chatman-10/12/1997
9032 Richard, other than WDC, APM's main customers are Quantum, Maxtor, NEC, andBrian Lempel-10/12/1997
9031 UGGator 93, I tend to agree that Crisman would probably not preannounce APM notRichard Haugland-10/12/1997
9030 Damon, it is my understanding that it is required by law for companies to inforBrian Lempel-10/12/1997
9029 <i>If we were going to miss by more than a few cents, I think that CrismaUFGator93-10/12/1997
9028 >>When Crisman started the hostile takeover, Vinik dumped his position, tAlienTech-10/12/1997
9027 Tsaen, I think that after earnings, not only will we jump to reflect the earninBrian Lempel-10/12/1997
9026 Joseph: SELL, SELL, SELL. EOM.Richard Haugland-10/12/1997
9025 APM reached a peak of P/E of almost 10 during its relatively recent run-ups to Richard Haugland-10/12/1997
9024 The fact that Vinik is not incarcerated speaks volumes about the power of moneymike thomas-10/12/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):