SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
SLJB - Sulja Brothers Building Supply, Inc.
An SI Board Since September 2006
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1681 30 0 SLJB
Emcee:  Done, gone. Type:  Moderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
906OK - so come up with something. So far, the allegations aren't sufficient evrrufff-11/30/2006
905Ammerman fiction: press.arrivenet.com Never happenedStar the Wonder Pup-11/30/2006
904I'm not threatening anyone and I don't see that to which you are referrirrufff-11/30/2006
903<i>As Buckey states, none of this seems particularly relevant with respectDone, gone.-11/30/2006
902I'm still wondering why Dennis Ammerman apparently told people to talk PETARscion-11/30/2006
901RRUFF - Ive been around. Red flags of big deals in far away places with entitieBuckey-11/30/2006
900There may be difference in statutory law but the basics of common law, particularrufff-11/30/2006
899Cameila made it quite clear in one of her posts- <i><b>There is a biscion-11/30/2006
898<i>couldnt resist one little bash</i> <b>You're banned, cDone, gone.-11/30/2006
897I think she sounds honest also. But there is a lot missing and, you are also rirrufff-11/30/2006
896I think she is telling the truth. It has no material effect on SLJB at this poiBuckey-11/30/2006
895Buckey, I agree. There is something missing in the story, perhaps unintentionalrrufff-11/30/2006
894OK, you stated that you don't know "how the cheque was altered. It was rrufff-11/30/2006
893Nash, first of all - Ive been there on the desperation front and put my home anBuckey-11/30/2006
892One more day like today and SLJB will be worth less than 1/10 of what it was wheDone, gone.-11/30/2006
891There is a big distinction between Canadian and US law. In Canada we have certiNash363-11/30/2006
890So the entire matter took place in Ontario. The Toronto police-OPP investigated scion-11/30/2006
889I'm still trying to understand the story. You were the escrow attorney and yrrufff-11/30/2006
888LoftWerks ( LFWK.pk ) is a leading provider in the emerging market trend of reviscion-11/30/2006
887G & G Fabricating is locating in the Toronto area. They banked in downtown Nash363-11/30/2006
886Where is G & G Fabricating located?scion-11/30/2006
885I'm sure you have all the contact details you need for Petar Vucicevich now scion-11/30/2006
884The cheque was in Canadian Funds The amount was $143,800.00 The payor was G &Nash363-11/30/2006
883Issues asked rrufff The altered cheque. The cheque WAS NOT altered by me or anyNash363-11/30/2006
882Welocome back Cameila, and thanks for the clarification. I hope you noticed thatscion-11/30/2006
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):