SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Knight/Trimark Group, Inc.
An SI Board Since July 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
10027 74 0 KCG
Emcee:  jacksoo Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
9077<<Have you been watching SNL again?>> LOL! Come to think of it, maybSir Francis Drake-9/11/2000
9076<i>just simmer down</i> Morgan, Have you been watching SNL again?Bob Kim-9/11/2000
9075When there were upgrades nite didnt move up. Now we need the reverse to occur. Umichael97123-9/11/2000
9074Btw., the new SEC rule about equal disclosure, approved on Aug 10, is scheduled Sir Francis Drake-9/11/2000
9073And another one - looks like Jeffries just whacked their price target for NITE fSir Francis Drake-9/11/2000
9072Yeah, with "BUY" ratings like this, who the heck needs a "Downgrafiberman-9/11/2000
9071Boy, H&Q really whacked those 3Q numbers, LOL! From 46 cents down to 30! CitSir Francis Drake-9/11/2000
9070Earnings estimates cut: And as I said, here it comes - earnings estimates cut, Sir Francis Drake-9/11/2000
9069IMHO, options effects are overwhelmed by the buyout speculation which is the reaSir Francis Drake-9/11/2000
9068Who maybe interested in NITE right now? Nice jump to 33.xx, but UNFORTUNATELY ofiberman-9/11/2000
9067Guess its official: GS buying Spears. cbs.marketwatch.com "Goldman's Sir Francis Drake-9/11/2000
9066Lets use Morgans 65 as a possible offer price. Who out there is left to buy nitemichael97123-9/11/2000
9065Goldman Sachs is buying Spear Leeds for 6.5 billion,as per CNBC. This could onlmanny t-9/11/2000
9064NY Times article... nytimes.com "September 11, 2000 Hostile Suitor to MaSir Francis Drake-9/11/2000
9063The plot thickens... There are more twists and turns in the high-stakes game ofSir Francis Drake-9/11/2000
9062The European drama continues... A pair of articles. As I've said from the bSir Francis Drake-9/10/2000
9061blankmind - of course NITE is undervalued. I think at this point NITE's fairSir Francis Drake-9/9/2000
9060Morgan - are you overlooking the run-up in brokerage stocks? - NITE's totablankmind-9/9/2000
9059Gary, yes I was rather shocked when I saw that number. However, remember that thSir Francis Drake-9/9/2000
9058Morgan, that $2.7B rev number for SLK just seems WAY out of whack. From their wgbh-9/9/2000
9057Morgan, I bolded the number because I believe it is in error; big time. SLKC isgbh-9/9/2000
9056Gary - agreed re: Caroline. "Orderly markets" and MMs - this has been Sir Francis Drake-9/9/2000
9055<i>Certainly cheaper than buying NITE. </i> That's what I wouldgbh-9/8/2000
9054<i>A declining market can also be tough for market makers, which traditiongbh-9/8/2000
9053TMF perspective on the NDB debacle, mentions NITE... All in all, not a very cheSir Francis Drake-9/8/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News