SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Palweb Corp (PAEB)
An SI Board Since April 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
2512 8 0
Emcee:  Steven M. McCaffrey Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
912 Well this has been a shock to the system. For what its worth, my take is that MChas-6/24/1998
911 I bailed out up in the .40 and was looking for a place to get back in. With thiROY SENDELE-6/24/1998
910 If the Board voted for a reverse split does that make it a done deal or does Dallas-6/24/1998
909 Without news from the Union Group companies its hard to figure a value , the Dallas-6/24/1998
908 Sorry, used the wrong figure should be 23.5% not 28% so theres your 150milliDallas-6/24/1998
907 I'm still confused. If the price of CBNR yesterday reflected 28% of plastiMicropicker-6/24/1998
906 The old CABEC is only 28% of the new CABEC/PPP and 100% of the new CABEC/UnioDallas-6/24/1998
905 The real question- HOW MANY SHARES ISSUED! The key question in all of this is Micropicker-6/24/1998
904 The MM's will change bid and ask to 10x's the price on the day of the rDallas-6/24/1998
903 Michael John............All the good news that you have pending would take thisDallas-6/24/1998
902 HARRY I agree with your last post IMHO this stock mite start ( post split ) at P.S.N.-6/24/1998
901 CLARIFICATION In my disgust and haste to respond, I wish to expand to my last pHarry Carr-6/24/1998
900 dear Mr. Harry Carr please read my post carfully the stock price will not be $0michael john-6/24/1998
899 Finally I hear from you Michael John, I've been trying for over a week. AgrHarry Carr-6/24/1998
898 just a little correction with the reverse split the stock price will increase 1michael john-6/24/1998
897 One possible hope. This company has a past history of tripping itself up on prMicropicker-6/24/1998
896 WE HAVE NEWS!!! Company announced postponement of spin-off and a reverse splitHarry Carr-6/24/1998
895 Press release today. The split out is delayed. Should we now be adding back iMicropicker-6/24/1998
894 Mike Good to hear from you again. Apparently your getting out at .23 was a goHarry Carr-6/24/1998
893 Mike, you are extremely right....anyone that follows Mark Schultz can make monAli Asad-6/18/1998
892 Thanks, I thought maybe it had just gotten hammered but it appears to be a fairTraderGreg-6/18/1998
891 >Since the record date is June 10, the current price essentially reflects thMark A. Schroeder-6/18/1998
890 Since the record date is June 10, the current price essentially reflects the paTraderGreg-6/18/1998
889 The record date for shareholders was June 10. As far as I know, the actual spinMark A. Schroeder-6/18/1998
888 Thanks for that last comment. Makes sense to me. Do you know record dates and smaurice18-6/18/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News