Presstek -- Stock of the Decade?? | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks
Presstek -- Stock of the Decade??

An SI Board Since March 1996

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
11098	20	0	PRST

Emcee: SI (no user)	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
9123	<<My doubt does not set well with your bearish position on PRST.>>	James C. Shircliff	-	4/23/1998
9122	Paul, My limited knowledge of the mechanics of these presses leads me to guess	SG	-	4/23/1998
9121	Paul, my wild eyed bullish speculation seems to be making you nervous. The indu	SG	-	4/23/1998
9120	Mr Wrongway Galloway: Could you explain your statement: "Creo has to hav	paul abramowitz	-	4/23/1998
9119	Paul, the new cost effective PRST laser info comes straight from the horses mou	SG	-	4/23/1998
9118	From post #9113 "Creo is still having problems (says my best rumor source)	GVTucker	-	4/23/1998
9117	Wrongway Galloway: You are correct on the two facilities, more overhead. Cost	paul abramowitz	-	4/23/1998
9116	GV, all 4 of my bullish ideas from the post you question are based on facts.	SG	-	4/23/1998
9115	Scott, I sure am glad you have no facts to support your bullish position.	GVTucker	-	4/23/1998
9114	Did you all notice this: Silicon Investor and go2net merger? April 23, 1998	SG	-	4/23/1998
9113	Tom, I think the one trick pony days are over. The Seybold report may not be as	SG	-	4/23/1998
9112	Tom: For you longs, I hope not. Prst is currently valued at more than 100% of	paul abramowitz	-	4/22/1998
9111	Maybe Batelle R&D is going to confirm the Seybold marketing report ?? Sor	Thomas J Engelsma	-	4/22/1998
9110	Again, PRst could not break out at this level ($16 1/2 to $17) in spite of the	James C. Shircliff	-	4/22/1998
9109	<<Why the heck is the stock moving over $16 if it is no good?>> I l	James C. Shircliff	-	4/22/1998
9108	Wrongway: "Paul, I hope this illustration shows you manufacturing and mar	paul abramowitz	-	4/22/1998
9107	Neil, If you get a chance could you respond to some questions that I have. I a	SG	-	4/22/1998
9106	Paul, I don't think anyone outside of Presstek-Battelle know what speci	Robert C. Petersen	-	4/22/1998
9105	Pierre: I agree with you on the "late" thing. Called PRST today to	drakes353	-	4/22/1998
9104	Again, What marketing advice?	paul abramowitz	-	4/22/1998
9103	Paul, Read the first line of my post, "I never said that they "Ba	Robert C. Petersen	-	4/22/1998
9102	Bob: If you read my post, I agree with your perception of technical expertise.	paul abramowitz	-	4/22/1998
9101	Paul, I didn't say they marketed anything, I said they had expertise i	Robert C. Petersen	-	4/22/1998
9100	Next week would be late. Last year they reported on the 22nd , in 1997 the 25th	Pierre Panet-Raymond	-	4/22/1998
9099	When did you talk to Prst?	paul abramowitz	-	4/22/1998

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):