SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
Actual left/right wing discussion
An SI Board Since September 2006
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
10087 36 0
Emcee:  one_less Type:  Moderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
9162(first part) This one.. Darwinian on December 17, 2010 - 9:52am Just heard ShaWharf Rat-12/17/2010
9161An odd duck indeed. Get rid of it. If acceptance and recognition is the issue thone_less112/17/2010
9160<i>I always thought DADT was just another type of 'but I didn't inLane3-12/17/2010
9159Back when it started I wasn't paying attention and had no opinion .... it seBrumar89-12/17/2010
9158I always thought DADT was just another type of 'but I didn't inhale'one_less112/17/2010
9157<i>Where does privacy enter in when we're now talking about having socLane3-12/17/2010
9156<i>Property rights most important for those WITHOUT riches and clout:</Brumar89112/17/2010
9155I see the same issue in DADT. DADT respects privacy perfectly. But whats wanteBrumar89-12/17/2010
9154The key word in that question is 'legal'. Society can recognize lots of one_less112/17/2010
9153What Energy Shortage? We are literally swimming in energy, heck we are energy. one_less112/17/2010
9152<i>Americans just too dumb to know they're dumb losers and need the goBrumar89-12/17/2010
9151Where does privacy enter in when we're now talking about having society recoBrumar89-12/17/2010
9150<i>Generally, I think we need more of that, not less.</i> Maybe. ILane3-12/17/2010
9149<i>a director more sympathetic to industry</i> Generally, I think wJoe Btfsplk-12/17/2010
9148<i>"Either way, it's illogical."</i> Just one of the Oeconomicus-12/17/2010
9147<i>I was thinking of something more ethics/policy driven</i> I undeLane3-12/17/2010
9146"Haven’t We Been Told that Comparing Gay Sex to Incest Was Wrong?" IfLane3-12/17/2010
9145<i>"And although my comments were forwarded to the party responsible one_less112/17/2010
9144Wonderful job you did.Brumar89-12/17/2010
9143Thanks. The solution turned out to be quite simple. After notifying them that I one_less112/17/2010
9142>>>about two different reaps and two different reapers. <i>"one_less112/17/2010
9141<i>Incredible resources, to which their state thugs can add vigorish to beLane3-12/17/2010
9140<i>I do expect science to help us understand that solutions which violate Lane3-12/17/2010
9139Sounds pretty accurate to me.Brumar89-12/17/2010
9138Terrible situation. I'm glad you were there to help. <i>no one givinLane3-12/17/2010
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News