SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Bill Wexler's Dog Pound
An SI Board Since March 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol SI Sentiment
10293 141 0 REFR ★★★★★ (Strong Buy)
Emcee:  Bill Wexler Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
9218That isn't the main phone number Bill. At least go to the web site and look.N. Dixon-3/1/2003
9217I see. So then you also agree that the main phone number listed on the sham &quBill Wexler-3/1/2003
9216And I'm just pointing out that YOU'RE a SHAM "billwexler." N. Dixon-3/1/2003
9215No...not "his" wife...just an alias. The Roman Reyes in Delaware has Bill Wexler-3/1/2003
9214"comes back with an alias of Rosalinda Reyes"????? Could Rosalinda beN. Dixon-3/1/2003
9213On August 19, 2002, Research Frontiers Inc. (NASDAQ: REFR) issued a press releasBill Wexler-3/1/2003
9212You don't need to work hard to expose Bill Wexler. He does it so beautifullyN. Dixon-3/1/2003
9211Nope. That "Roman Reyes" comes back with an alias of "Rosalinda Bill Wexler-3/1/2003
9210You would be wrong. As you are wrong about Roman Reyes. To:Bill Wexler who starN. Dixon-3/1/2003
9209Well...unfortunately the only "Nancy Dixon" in San Francisco who meetsBill Wexler-3/1/2003
9208Reyes, Roman 845 Watson Lane MESILLA PARK, NM 88047 505-524-4809 Bill, Are yN. Dixon-3/1/2003
9207An open letter to Bill Wexler by: aarrcc 03/01/03 04:59 pm Msg: 132322 of 13232N. Dixon-3/1/2003
9206Yes Bill's "research" is reknown. He had me owning a home in ScottN. Dixon-3/1/2003
9205<b>An open letter to the thread and especially 'Bill Wexler'</bN. Dixon-3/1/2003
9204<i>An open letter to the thread and especially 'N. Dixon'</i>panteon-3/1/2003
9203<b>An open letter to the thread and especially 'N. Dixon' </b&gBill Wexler-3/1/2003
9202Bill, Wow can't believe you have time to post when you're working the RN. Dixon-2/28/2003
9201Bought more EMC (right after downgrade)...buying more AMAT.Bill Wexler-2/28/2003
9200Of what? That the grand foos ba himself just arrived? You didn't need to aMike M-2/26/2003
9199Amen. All u foos take note.Sir Auric Goldfinger-2/25/2003
9198On long positions, I don't throw in the towel at any particular price (especBill Wexler-2/25/2003
9197<i>I have the utmost faith in the ability of the company to reinvent itselchojiro-2/24/2003
9196Right. I had intended to make comment on the structure of the derivatives but tMike M-2/24/2003
9195Regarding the buy-ins, why couldn't they have been forced to cover because tDanZ-2/24/2003
9194Re:<<Well then how do you explain the fact that, particularly during the bMike M-2/24/2003
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News