Presstek -- Stock of the Decade?? | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks
Presstek -- Stock of the Decade??

An SI Board Since March 1996

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
11098	20	0	PRST

Emcee: SI (no user)	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
9223	Father....Sorry, no E-Mail from Presstek to save or destroy! Phone conversatio	NEIL MACK	-	4/29/1998
9222	Actually, volume has only retreated from the megashare panic levels accompanyin	dkmax	-	4/29/1998
9221	This stock is dead, no volume = no interest	paul abramowitz	-	4/29/1998
9220	thank you for that interesting post. Neil would you please give us the name of	Father E.	-	4/29/1998
9219	Neil, Thanks for responding, but as you could imagine, I have a couple comment	Brent	-	4/29/1998
9218	GV....I agree with your below solution....sounds quite reasonable. "If P	NEIL MACK	-	4/29/1998
9217	Brent in response to your post: I stated....<Presstek was still demanding a	NEIL MACK	-	4/29/1998
9216	Neil, that is a pure crock and YOU KNOW IT!. A normal reaction from an executi	Pierre Panet-Raymond	-	4/29/1998
9215	As I understand it, Presstek was not required to set up this conference call, s	dkmax	-	4/29/1998
9214	To All..... I spoke with a high-level employee of ATS...the PRST confere	Steve Andrew	-	4/29/1998
9213	For your benefit, I am copying this post from the Motley Fool. I do not know w	GVTucker	-	4/29/1998
9212	Good point, GV. Do you remember what happened to the price of the stock in the	James C. Shircliff	-	4/29/1998
9211	<< From the sounds of things at Presstek, someone at the conference cente	GVTucker	-	4/29/1998
9210	<Presstek was still demanding answers why analysts questions were not acknow	Brent	-	4/28/1998
9209	Neil, sorry does not get it. This is a very better pill to swallow. <eom>	SG	-	4/28/1998
9208	No JM, I was saying that I do not believe whoever told you that crock. If you s	Pierre Panet-Raymond	-	4/28/1998
9207	To All....Having spoken to Presstek regarding their Conference Call not respond	NEIL MACK	-	4/28/1998
9206	Well, I guess I had been somewhat influenced by Pierre's expectations: To:	E	-	4/28/1998
9205	Pierre, some posters on AOL's Motley Fool also said they wanted to ask ques	Momo Dog	-	4/28/1998
9204	What a joke that so called conference call was. It lasted exactly 8 minutes and	Pierre Panet-Raymond	-	4/28/1998
9203	Certainly further slippage there. On February 19th the company said that the fa	Pierre Panet-Raymond	-	4/28/1998
9202	There are many other much more important reasons to bail, dk. I was just relay	GVTucker	-	4/28/1998
9201	Sounds like big trouble with the plate mfg facility if they are slipping from m	dkmax	-	4/28/1998
9200	if that is true we could adjust my model for no margin improvement until 3rd or	Father E.	-	4/28/1998
9199	NO I think thats why there were "no questions" as at least I hit the	paul abramowitz	-	4/28/1998

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):