SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Knight/Trimark Group, Inc.
An SI Board Since July 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
10027 74 0 KCG
Emcee:  jacksoo Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
9277Gary, There is nothing against the law about a ceo changing his mind. And perhapmichael97123-9/17/2000
9276<i>I don't think for a second KP was "surprised" by the vol/gbh-9/17/2000
9275<i>KP has said in the past that he wasn't interested in selling out<gbh-9/17/2000
9274<OT>Sad, but true... nytimes.com "Leaders of the Pack Mentality BySir Francis Drake-9/17/2000
9273Big changes at Nasdaq trading... nytimes.com "A New Plan Recalls the Old Sir Francis Drake-9/17/2000
9272Bob, I seem to remember KP's internet push before July, but don't have tSir Francis Drake-9/17/2000
9271Morgan, Remember that AB put a $51 price target on WITC saying it deserved an iBob Kim-9/17/2000
9270blankmind, when I'm wrong, I'll be happy to acknowledge that. So far, I Sir Francis Drake-9/17/2000
9269- Morgan, any chance you'll admit you were wrong? - Or do you really thinkblankmind-9/16/2000
9268Gary, if I'm correct, KP has said in the past that he wasn't interested Keith J-9/16/2000
9267Useless analysis - part II The more interesting question here is: was it possibSir Francis Drake-9/16/2000
9266Well Gary, that was certainly a depressing post - and I thought depressing was mSir Francis Drake-9/16/2000
9265Thanks Gary. Excellent post, although I am hoping for a slightly better price. michael97123-9/16/2000
9264Now there's a totally bright statement... "The August bulletin board fithomas odonoghue-9/16/2000
9263All of a sudden the TSC is positive on NITE! It must be driving Cramer (not toAlohal-9/16/2000
9262gbh: You said it all and said it well. I agree with the 45-50 takeout price, tAlohal-9/15/2000
9261Seems pretty obvious that Penson simply can't compete because of lack of scagbh-9/15/2000
9260A very interesting development-- The clearing firm Penson (used by one of my brSir Francis Drake-9/15/2000
9259NYSE seats remain very valuable-- Wonder when NITE might want to get in directlSir Francis Drake-9/15/2000
9258Morgan, once again, thank you for your posting. This is a GREAT information tofiberman-9/15/2000
9257With all the frenzy and excitement of the NITE buy out situation, and the huge rSir Francis Drake-9/15/2000
9256DLJ has a report on NITE's buyout valuation. DONALDSON, LUFKIN & JENRETSir Francis Drake-9/15/2000
9255Sad stuff. Actually for once TSCM is useful - a pair of articles on the brokeragSir Francis Drake-9/15/2000
9254And what IF there is a stupid article in Barron's over the weekend?? Man I fiberman-9/15/2000
9253Could it be that the rumors of takeover talks have induced heavy covering of shojbn3-9/15/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News