SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Sepracor-Looks very promising
An SI Board Since August 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
10280 115 0 SEPR
Emcee:  rkrw Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
9280I looked at SEPR's latest 10-K and they say: "A valuation allowance isCrazyPete-2/1/2006
9279"Sorry everyone to have started this." Not a problem here in the leasRocky9-2/1/2006
9278You would think that I would learn to keep my mouth shut. I know about deferredkenhott-2/1/2006
9277Current L runrate with the 9% price increase recently implemented and the most rRobohogs-1/31/2006
9276Baird raised target to 81. Jon ML and MS also came out strongly in support.Robohogs-1/31/2006
9275You are correct - all of you. When the allowance is no longer in doubt, the resRobohogs-1/31/2006
9274Yes I agree with your amendments. For the second issue (writedown of the DTA) Biomaven-1/31/2006
9273Some reports for today, from negative to positive. Prudential - Underweight. BlRocky9-1/31/2006
9272>>Official accounting gurus like IJ feel free to correct/amplify. It'IRWIN JAMES FRANKEL-1/31/2006
9271Agreed, and that is, albeit in my vernacular, pretty much what I had written. Tquidditch-1/31/2006
9270I think this is governed by SFAS 109. My understanding is that the loss makingBiomaven-1/31/2006
9269Everyone else read only if you wish to fall to sleep without Lunesta. On the fikenhott-1/31/2006
9268Kudos to you and Jon. Takes guts with this stock. I am patting myself on the bFiloF-1/31/2006
9267I'll confess to a small flutter on SEPR Feb calls yesterday (inspired by JonBiomaven-1/31/2006
9266H, that would be a good trend if it holds--that was really the thrust of my obsequidditch-1/31/2006
9265Are you talking about tax reporting or financial reporting??? Sorry but I am a kenhott-1/31/2006
9264Congrats buds!..awesome..Elisabethzeta1961-1/31/2006
9263Quid, Current L scripts are already 15%-20% higher than the Q4 average - so thaHarold Engstrom-1/31/2006
9262Ken, maybe you could be more specific? In my experience, that is exactly how itquidditch-1/31/2006
9261"Sepracor feeling pressure" Standard & Poor’s Equity Research anaCrazyPete-1/31/2006
9260<Does anyone know if SEPR has taken a valuation reserve on those tax assets?.kenhott-1/31/2006
9259Looking closer at the numbers and comparing to my eps models. SG&A spend srkrw-1/31/2006
9258HAHAHAHAHA. rkrw-1/31/2006
9257Xopenex projection is eye catching. Looks like minimal cannibalization from the rkrw-1/31/2006
9256<<< Does this mean that attycpa will stop posting about how SEPR has nDavid Howe-1/31/2006
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):