SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks
NAAC - National Affiliated Corp. $1 and Moving to $10
An SI Board Since September 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1587 1 0 NAAC
Emcee:  timemizer Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
937 Nice to see you guys are no longer bickering. Not that we cannot have our diffestockster-8/2/1998
936 Sorry if I have been a little cranky lately (paperman). The info I had originalGlenRP-8/2/1998
935 Smart post. I agree paper man-8/2/1998
934 I still am concerned that the audit is not done. Until answered the J&L aRock Bottom-8/1/1998
933 I meant Ubanks. It was on the tip of my tongue type of the thing. My beck was paper man-8/1/1998
932 Paperman & Glen - Ok gents, it seems that we are forgetting why we have thestockster-7/31/1998
931 I give up who the hell is Beck! The new Accounting firm I believe is Ubank and GlenRP-7/31/1998
930 Good thought , but the NAIC recognized the potential for "state by state&qThe Other One-7/31/1998
929 Does anyone know when the meeting started today and for that matter is it over?daaan-7/31/1998
928 "Hope your subway business comes along with a solid 8K. Seems like the NewJames-7/31/1998
927 I may go the a fall annual meeting, but not this proxy meeting. Also, I quess paper man-7/31/1998
926 Do I interpret from your message that you are going to the meeting? If so, wouSam Matz-7/31/1998
925 Sam.. sorry, and you are not a broken record. I understand this special proxy paper man-7/31/1998
924 I hate to be a broken record but is the shareholder's meeting today? Sam Matz-7/31/1998
923 GlenRp... you dont make me nervous, or your comments. I feel adequate with my paper man-7/31/1998
922 At one time there was consideration of J&L returning with some assistance. GlenRP-7/31/1998
921 Would these financial reports from J&L have any validity, though? What wasSam Matz-7/31/1998
920 Oh, didn't mean to squash your theory. To the contrary it sounds like a greMonteChristo-7/30/1998
919 Monte: You are right. I totally spaced on the fact that J&L isn't lisSam Matz-7/30/1998
918 I'm with you on this one pal. There ain't no short position to speak ofMonteChristo-7/30/1998
917 "Also NAAC was second bidder on the colorado deal but the first place biddMonteChristo-7/30/1998
916 Well it sure would solve a few problems. 1) It would prevent NAAC from suing tMonteChristo-7/30/1998
915 A fellow on the AOL thread suggested a few days ago that maybe Johnson and LambSam Matz-7/30/1998
914 Paperman I could be mistaken but I was under the impression that the form A wouGlenRP-7/30/1998
913 <<There are lots of things happening and more announcements are coming.&gSam Matz-7/30/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):