SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Presstek -- Stock of the Decade??
An SI Board Since March 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
11098 20 0 PRST
Emcee:  SI (no user) Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
9373 Some of you may be interested in this. ProNetLink PNLK has some news that linkKen Jensen-5/12/1998
9372 A strong hold. That is a hoot. What does a strong hold mean? If I have a margiFather E.-5/12/1998
9371 Hi James, In their last update, CABOT maintains Prestek as a strong hold! ThePurpleman-5/12/1998
9370 There are numerous different posts on the lhug forum that refer to problems witGVTucker-5/12/1998
9369 << NASA and Battelle in some joint project. Hmmm, that could be interestJames C. Shircliff-5/12/1998
9368 Paul, the street is giving us the present levels, not anything you or I say wilSG-5/12/1998
9367 Wrongway: Call the number prst just announce-29 mil in sales to hdlbrg for 98.paul abramowitz-5/12/1998
9366 Suspect? Little paranoia to add to the list. This company should have initiatedJames C. Shircliff-5/11/1998
9365 Frank, you can't really look at the recent additions of the quarterly (not SG-5/11/1998
9364 Olu, thank you very much. You confirm my suspicions that this is one to stay aFrank Griffin-5/11/1998
9363 You are right, Paul. But whatever announcement is made (PearlGold, laser, SpeedJames C. Shircliff-5/11/1998
9362 Jim: Could have been pre meeting jitters, but I am not concerned. Given the tpaul abramowitz-5/11/1998
9361 Today's runup Dear Glen, See post #9347. This runup is the prelude to the James C. Shircliff-5/11/1998
9360 Interesting run-up today. Volume is not that much higher that usual. What'Glenn Omura-5/11/1998
9359 SG, I only bought enough to get the annual report mailed to me. I am still net Pierre Panet-Raymond-5/11/1998
9358 Olu: I agree. At best PRST is dead money, and very expensive dead money in a bpaul abramowitz-5/11/1998
9357 Frank, To buy PRST now means that you expect something <b>great</b>Olu Emuleomo-5/11/1998
9356 Happy moms day to all who are moms. paul abramowitz-5/10/1998
9355 Dear Scott, I guess I just ain't as smart as you. The gradual change to whJames C. Shircliff-5/10/1998
9354 James, you said "It is the failure of the bulls to understand the gradual SG-5/9/1998
9353 Pierre, please forgive for my bad manners. You said in response to Neil's sSG-5/9/1998
9352 Neil, you say: <<It is the failure of the short to understand the sudden James C. Shircliff-5/9/1998
9351 Paul - Does Cabot still recommend PRST? Have not followed his recommendation oJames Young-5/9/1998
9350 Neil, you state 'there is no recent selling', and then ask why that isMomo Dog-5/9/1998
9349 Yes Paul....the stock IS down 80% from the record highs, and in my opinion makeNEIL MACK-5/9/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News