SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
Actual left/right wing discussion
An SI Board Since September 2006
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
10087 36 0
Emcee:  one_less Type:  Moderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
9387Neither in particular. I see lots of people tending to treat our founding documBrumar89-12/23/2010
9386The accompanying article noted abortions were down too. <i>The National CBrumar89-12/23/2010
9385Who's buying them?Brumar89-12/23/2010
9384That's the opinion of experts in this article: lifenews.com Yes, I know. Brumar89-12/23/2010
9383The only threatened sea lanes I know of are off Somalia, and we don't seem tneolib-12/23/2010
9382The army isn't composed of slaves. They work in the defense industries. --Brumar89-12/23/2010
9381What exactly is a "right" if not an outcome of some process? You can neolib-12/23/2010
9380As I asked you before, do you think "fairness" is more fuzzy than otheneolib-12/23/2010
9379Very roughly there is about $5T between the wars and any reasonable budget for oneolib-12/23/2010
9378I have to agree with Tim Fowler that $2T, or even $5T, would not do it. Solar wiJacques Chitte-12/23/2010
9377<i>"Why would you think I thought that?"</i> Umm, becauseOeconomicus112/23/2010
9376Wait, was that meant for me or neolib?Oeconomicus-12/23/2010
9375If it came from Locke, thats close to the Dark Ages despite being called the enlneolib-12/23/2010
9374<i>Consider that the Russians are using 65-year-old tech to launch all manneolib-12/23/2010
9373<I> Mobs run on emotions, not cool rational conceptualization. </i> TimF-12/23/2010
9372 Not simple at all. For one thing we can't rely on solar no matter how mucTimF-12/23/2010
9371<i>" How either the Royalty of europe or Jefferson himself knew what one_less-12/23/2010
9370lol "What's on the cable tonight, honey?" <edit> I realize Jacques Chitte-12/23/2010
9369Manhattan-type projects are overrated imo. We've had two in the middle decadJacques Chitte112/23/2010
9368Yeah, I hate being snookered. BTW, birthrates in general fall during recessionsneolib-12/23/2010
9367The argument I've seen is cheap entertainment.neolib-12/23/2010
9366All I'm pointing out is that the cost we have paid in the last decade which neolib-12/23/2010
9365Financial protection, perhaps? <grin>Jacques Chitte-12/23/2010
9364I was just posting to call your attention to that when I saw your message in my Lane3-12/23/2010
9363Solar energy will come into its own once pricing favors it. Fossil energy pricesJacques Chitte212/23/2010
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News