SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
Strictly: Drilling and oil-field services
An SI Board Since January 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
95453 259 0 OSX.X
Emcee:  Olaf Koch Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
94153ROYL has hit another gusher.Victor Lazlo-9/5/2001
94152<i><b>Tetra earnings projection rises with natural gas well pluggingBrumar89-9/5/2001
94151Hard to judge from the text exactly what happens. I figured they reduced the pThe Ox-9/5/2001
94150Thought I would post a complete list of what I hold for possible acquisition plaTommaso-9/5/2001
94149Thought I would post a complete list of what I hold for possible acquisition plaTommaso-9/5/2001
94148Anybody can to comment on that Unifab news just posted ? Sounds like they accepWebster Groves-9/4/2001
94147Cooper Cameron Division Wins Subsea Systems Contract slb.com Energy Companies BThe Ox-9/4/2001
94146On the recommendation of isopatch a week or so ago, I took a pretty good sized pTommaso-9/4/2001
94145Santa Fe to buy Global Marine in $3 bln stock deal By Tom Johnson NEW YORK, SeGlenn Petersen-9/3/2001
94144John - Although some take pleasure in disparaging the follies of O&G companSecond_Titan-9/3/2001
94143Bob That is a seven-month-old press release from Williams, released on a day whupanddown-9/2/2001
94142williams.com Note - 1 BCF per day! That is the equivalent of a lot wells in thBearcatbob-9/2/2001
94141Thanks for clearing the issue up. What you say makes a lot of sense.Think4Yourself-9/2/2001
94140Fair enough. CMS also has a LNG plant in Louisiana (I think) that should be onliThink4Yourself-9/2/2001
94139I agree with you view on gas demand. LNG is still a very small part of supply, Edmond Katonica-9/2/2001
94138John - I must agree that a major impact is three years away. However, there is Bearcatbob-9/2/2001
94137Based on what you bring up, I haven't missed a thing. The increase we are inThink4Yourself-9/2/2001
94136Tomasso - my understanding is gas above $3.00 per mcf is ok. Remember - it can Bearcatbob-9/2/2001
94135John - I believe you miss a lot in your understanding of LNG. First an increaseBearcatbob-9/2/2001
94134JQP - re: shoddy welding. Most offshore construction jobs are covered by BRI (Bldo79-9/2/2001
94133There is a serious choke limiting the amount of LNG that can be imported and thaThink4Yourself-9/2/2001
94132My understanding was that LNG needed a price of at least $4.50 MMCF to be profitTommaso-9/2/2001
94131"Even if all plants announced for startup in 2004 and beyond are dropped frBearcatbob-9/2/2001
94130Intresting N, Gas Article 199.97.97.163Edmond Katonica-9/2/2001
94129Fidelity lets me sell calls, & buy puts and calls in my IRA. DId have sign aenergyplay-9/2/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):