SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Covad Communications - COVD
An SI Board Since January 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
10485 112 0 COVD
Emcee:  Mark Duper Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
9435Amen. Thanks for saying what I was thinking, but failing to put into proper worRKHIII-6/8/2005
9434I didn't say I didn't want anything done. I want the company to get relifishing4thebigone-6/8/2005
9433I disagree and believe most would also. OTC BB is not an exchange. Some think irrufff-6/8/2005
9432I am telling you that is how it will be viewed....stupid or not. The AMEX is notfishing4thebigone-6/8/2005
9431LOL - I can't give you the full laugh because you have been right all along rrufff-6/8/2005
9430The downside is admission that the company has no hope to ever make it back to Nfishing4thebigone-6/8/2005
9429LOL Either way, it's all about the colors, man.RKHIII-6/8/2005
9428I'm going back to my college days. But isn't that THC not DSL? I can srrufff-6/7/2005
9427Geez! Does anyone understand anyone else here? I've never seen so many peoRKHIII-6/7/2005
9426Hey - sorry you didn't disagree. You're just plain disagreeable LOL..rrufff-6/7/2005
9425It's funny, because just earlier today I was thinking I couldn't keep rrAndre Williamson-6/7/2005
9424<i>Why should I? I posted in favor. I thought you were disagreeing.</i&Andre Williamson-6/7/2005
9423Why should I? I posted in favor. I thought you were disagreeing.rrufff-6/7/2005
9422<i>BTW - what's the downside to COVD going on AMEX??</i> You teAndre Williamson-6/7/2005
9421Well, we'll have to agree to disagree. The more I read on the subjects, therrufff-6/7/2005
9420<i>complaints about naked shorting and other scams are not "red herriAndre Williamson-6/7/2005
9419WOW, short covering supreme! Nice buy, take a look: Amex: TCF Cramer had the CEOCaptain James T. Kirk-6/7/2005
9418Your post covers a lot of areas and to respond would be much like trying to deferrufff-6/7/2005
9417<i>I'd think that an AMEX listing would</i> I agree, and just sAndre Williamson-6/7/2005
9416I don't know whether there is heavy shorting, naked or clothed, but I do knorrufff-6/7/2005
9415I tend to agree but rruff has strong feelings about it so I left it out there. Trjk01-6/7/2005
9414<i>naked shorting</i> Not a problem here IMO. There are way too maAndre Williamson-6/7/2005
9413there is a discussion on that over the Yahoo board, you might find some answers rjk01-6/7/2005
9412Well, that makes two of us. I don't understand you either. Let's jusRKHIII-6/7/2005
9411NASDAQ small cap is only $4, but COVD is a long way from that. I don't quitrrufff-6/7/2005
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News