SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
IGEN International
An SI Board Since January 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1025 31 0 IGEN
Emcee:  John Zwiener Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
950and we're sinking once again...hard to imagine it getting back to this low pSkywatcher-3/12/2003
949Roche under pressure after Chugai settles suit Reuters, sim1-3/12/2003
948While we wait. Here's the decision from an appeal in the case when IGEN gotjpbrody-3/5/2003
947<i>How do you feel about the stock at these prices?</i> I don'tBiomaven-3/5/2003
946I was just doing a little checking around and I came across that piece. Since i613-3/5/2003
945That's an outright misrepresentation of anything that happened in the lower Biomaven-3/5/2003
944While we are waiting, can someone comment on this fragment that I pulled from an613-3/5/2003
943IGEN mentioned in Baltimore Sun Article <i>Igen International Inc. of Gaisim1-3/2/2003
942stuart any idea what patent dispute they are talking about ??? or is this thedalroi-2/26/2003
941Roche hopes to settle IGEN patent case this year Wednesday February 2sim1-2/26/2003
940COMPANIES & FINANCE INTERNATIONAL: Unrealised losses at sim1-2/26/2003
939My assessment is that each knows the other needs his company. Maybe IGEN is askA.J. Mullen-2/25/2003
938So you think that IGEN's asking price is too high for Roche and they may act613-2/25/2003
937613, The reason I hedged was not that I thought the case would go badly (in facBiomaven-2/25/2003
936Since you precognitavely hedged, what's your current take?613-2/25/2003
935Thanks, Peter. FWIW (not much, since I'm no longer in IGEN) I always thoughttom pope-2/25/2003
934In addition to Lawfighter's report, there's also the following form sonoBiomaven-2/25/2003
933Thanks for that....it's a tough thread on Yahoo.... yesterday was VERY painfSkywatcher-2/25/2003
932From lawfighter on yahoo I just returned from listening to the oral arguments tPaul Lee-2/25/2003
931How come nobody is discussing the court case on SI? Yahoo has too many useless 613-2/25/2003
930Already a Giant, Novartis Wants to Bulk Up By JOHN TAGLIABUE [NYT] BASEL, Switsim1-2/23/2003
929OT Believe that at least some of the chemical detection on the battlefield is dtuck-2/20/2003
928"Dubbed Operation Kuwaiti Field Chicken (KFC)" At first, it seemed toJohn Metcalf-2/19/2003
927Who needs IGEN? :)   So does the army really need ECL technology to detect Biomaven-2/19/2003
926Roche's family is united Tom Abate Monday, February 17, 2003 sim1-2/18/2003
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):