SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
Actual left/right wing discussion
An SI Board Since September 2006
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
10087 36 0
Emcee:  one_less Type:  Moderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
9512<i>Seems to me that a right is anything 1) you can claim for yourself (or neolib-12/29/2010
9511<i>"People are going to keep on having opinions unless someone stops one_less-12/29/2010
9510<i>I don't think I like the term for what he uses it for. Libertarian-Lane3-12/29/2010
9509<i>we lack sufficient justification to maintain them for the duration.<Lane3-12/29/2010
9508<I> It leads me to wonder - what about the rest of the state's legislaTimF-12/29/2010
9507I was tempted a couple of times but avoided using the word 'fundamental'one_less-12/29/2010
9506<I> I am always attracted to those who seem to understand both sides and lTimF-12/29/2010
9505<b>“Nor, does it seem, that I'm able to offer any added value,…</b&one_less-12/29/2010
9504>I am unable to conclude the existence of natural rights from what's beenJacques Chitte-12/29/2010
9503Thank you for being patient. I think, between your efforts and Lane3's, I arJacques Chitte-12/29/2010
9502<i>I really messed up if that is how that post came across. I've not dLane3-12/29/2010
9501dittoone_less-12/29/2010
9500<b>"We hold that these conditions are right for all people. So we wilone_less-12/29/2010
9499<b>"Are you saying that if what you know in the essence of your beingone_less-12/29/2010
9498Oh goodness. I don't think you disrupted. I'm glad of the company.Jacques Chitte-12/29/2010
9497<i>You have expressed a big part of my question in more accessible terms.&Lane3-12/29/2010
9496<i>(I didn't watch the video BTW, I might if you endorse it as great bLane3-12/29/2010
9495>Jefferson <i>et al.</i> used the declarative approach, simply deJacques Chitte-12/29/2010
9494Thank you Lane3. You have expressed a big part of my question in more accessibleJacques Chitte-12/29/2010
9493I looked for text on rights v. privileges and found this: >There is a world Jacques Chitte-12/29/2010
9492Are you saying that if what you know in the essence of your being that what is bLane3-12/29/2010
9491<I> Without society's (or more accurately, government's) approval TimF-12/29/2010
9490From your link - <i> As a country, the United States has slouched dangerTimF-12/29/2010
9489To me it seemed to be common sense (self evident), which is why I declared it toone_less-12/29/2010
9488<i:We could keep adding to that list but I think we have agreed these are theLane3-12/29/2010
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News