SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Wind River going up, up, up!
An SI Board Since February 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
10309 186 0 WIND
Emcee:  Allen Benn Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
9584What earnings warning? Did you experience a weird feeling that the dreaded earnAllen Benn-5/7/2001
9583"Somewhere out there Mark Brophy is smiling" I had a feeling Mark wouRichard Knox-5/6/2001
9582They sure have set the world on fire! Anyone who bought Wind River when this thMark Brophy-5/6/2001
9581Hi Rinks, If you follow my logic, you will see that WRS has to lower its royaltlkj-5/6/2001
9580Brian - The following reference to the full H&Q report doesn't seem to Don Lloyd-5/6/2001
9579It works for me, so maybe it's your browser. It was a 70-month comparison cSnowshoe-5/5/2001
9578Re. siliconinvestor.com. It doesn't work, at least w/Netscape~ FWIW, JohnDJohnD-5/5/2001
9577Remember some of our past arguments? Here's a WIND/RSYS chart that covers thSnowshoe-5/5/2001
9576Hi Khan, "and those who want to differentiate their products will not chooCarpe per Diem-5/5/2001
9575<i>The only question that I still have is why did HP switch from Wind if tlkj-5/5/2001
9574Mark, I agree with everything you said. The only question that I still have is wAE-5/4/2001
9573Why are you frustrated? The stock price 2 years ago was 15 and today it's 2Mark Brophy-5/4/2001
9572I too have been a frustrated owner of Wind shares for the last four years. For oErwin Sanders-5/4/2001
9571<i>In closing, I'd simply like to add that for a long term WIND investKnight-5/4/2001
9570peter - <i>...Has there been any mention of write-offs associated with thDon Lloyd-5/4/2001
9569Brian, I want to add my thanks to you for your lily pond efforts, and for your peter grossman-5/4/2001
9568>>>sold at 61 I think it was>>> Good for you, Tom! With consPeter Church-5/4/2001
9567<i>I bought WIND in 1997,1998,1999,2000 and I am at a net loss in this stoJSwanson-5/4/2001
9566At this moment there are still 116 open jobs posted on WIND's web site. Let&Snowshoe-5/4/2001
9565Leaked Information Again! Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame onRichard Knox-5/4/2001
9564Tom and Mike: I agree that owning Wind stock in a big way has been very frustraw2j2-5/4/2001
9563General Interest 08:18 ET Wind River Sys (WIND) 26.18: -- Update -- WR Hambrechtom ablett-5/4/2001
9562You're welcome. And no, Wharton has been nothing but a disappointment. I hBrian Lempel-5/4/2001
9561Hi Brain, That was very helpful, and I am very glad to see you saying, <i>lkj-5/4/2001
9560Hi Khan, I am going to decline to post the lily pond link. The site is still uBrian Lempel-5/4/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News