Actual left/right wing discussion | Political Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics
Actual left/right wing discussion

An SI Board Since September 2006

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
10087	36	0

Emcee: one_less	Type: Moderated

Introduction Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
9587	Wow. I googled Bextra settlement and found this. bnet.com You've shown me a	Jacques Chitte	-	12/30/2010
9586	You could just as easily, and probably more correctly, say that the belief in	TimF	-	12/30/2010
9585	You can either have high resolution and low bandwidth or higher bandwidth and lo	neolib	-	12/30/2010
9584	Yes, that is an issue, and its not just the government grants and loans. Many p	neolib	-	12/30/2010
9583	I googled, and it was Bextra. The problem seems to have been that once it was o	neolib	-	12/30/2010
9582	I called equality under the law "an issue related to fairness". The	TimF	-	12/30/2010
9581	Ignorance is like crabgrass ... my money is on its startling capacity to survive	Jacques Chitte	-	12/30/2010
9580	<I> So other than the general Baumol syndrome, the single largest factor I	TimF	-	12/30/2010
9579	I googled that and did get lots of hits, but they were noise. Many partial recal	Jacques Chitte	-	12/30/2010
9578	You might want to follow the very nascent field of functional neuroimaging. I s	neolib	-	12/30/2010
9577	Ah, I missed the "recent" for some reason. IIRC, there was some very	neolib	-	12/30/2010
9576	Addendum. In re "failing to report internal data" to the FDA ... where	Jacques Chitte	-	12/30/2010
9575	I was hoping you'd recognize my post as humorous. As for accessing the dept	Jacques Chitte	-	12/30/2010
9574	Clearly that fails the "recently" part of my question. I worked in big	Jacques Chitte	1	12/30/2010
9573	<i>This is a perspective. It could be stated as a scientific fact but not	neolib	-	12/30/2010
9572	I like most of what you wrote there but I will challenge one statement. <i&g	one_less	1	12/30/2010
9571	<i>"If that were the only source of food, sure. How could it be other	one_less	-	12/30/2010
9570	<i>If I said you must eat (a basic fact of life), would you jump to the co	neolib	-	12/30/2010
9569	Change it to the obvious, the one they were trying to change away form: That me	neolib	-	12/30/2010
9568	<i>If I said you have the right to eat (a basic fact of life), would you j	Lane3	-	12/30/2010
9567	<i>Try changing your Truth1 and think about the rest of them.</i> C	Lane3	1	12/30/2010
9566	I don't see that you are out of options. I see you making giant leaps that a	one_less	-	12/30/2010
9565	<i>I would not conclude that and I don't see how you drew that conclus	Lane3	-	12/30/2010
9564	<b>"OK. A right to do something undesirable is still a right."&l	one_less	-	12/30/2010
9563	Try changing your Truth1 and think about the rest of them.	neolib	-	12/30/2010

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):